this post was submitted on 07 May 2026
389 points (84.2% liked)

Microblog Memes

11537 readers
2143 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Solumbran@lemmy.world 112 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Yeah the guy is a huge piece of shit, so let's not try to rewrite history by spreading nice little stories made to make him look good.

[–] Soulg@ani.social 45 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Why are people allergic to the idea that bad people can say good and correct things too

[–] dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Hitler loved to play with kittens! He carried them around in his shirt pockets to keep them cozy and warm.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Hitler loved dogs. Now think about how Trump is the only US president to have no pets, and dislike animals. Trump has less empathy — is more sociopathic — than Hitler.

Hitler also didn't rape kids.

[–] GalacticSushi@piefed.blahaj.zone 10 points 2 weeks ago

Hitler loved dogs

I do not like this picture, Charlie. It's smug aura mocks me!

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 1 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Hitler? Can't say I ever heard or read that one...

[–] Solumbran@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Everyone says good stuff once in a while, so why focus on the pieces of shit exactly?

[–] Soulg@ani.social 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Why is quoting a good thing they said somehow interpreted as rewriting history, especially when it's actually true that they said it? That's almost by definition, not "rewriting" history

[–] edible_funk@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

It can be taken as an endorsement of his other views too and I'm sure there's plenty of people that aren't shit head bigots that have had a similar realization about the vulnerability of women.

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Look, to be properly just, you need to aknowledge the good too in some peoole, whatever little they may have.

[–] edible_funk@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

No I fucking don't, fuck Dave Chappelle, he's transphobic piece of bigot shit, his Clayton Bigsby ass brought a fucking nazi on stage, he doesn't deserve anything but fucking derision.

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today -2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

There we go, that's the issue. People nowadays completely lost the plot, will downright make up crimes and get angry at them at this point.

You can't see what this implies long-term.

It won't take away from anything bad he did if you did talk about the good.

[–] scutiger@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

I mean he literally had Elon Musk come on stage and mocked the crowd for booing him.

I agree that he had good takes in the past and I don't think there's anything wrong with the OOP here, but the person you're replying to isn't inventing anything either. Old school Dave Chappelle was based and funny. Current Dave Chappelle is a piece of shit. I think both of those things are OK to acknowledge.

[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 19 points 2 weeks ago

Louis CK is also a piece of shit, but he said similarly true things about men and women. Ask him how he knows.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 9 points 2 weeks ago
[–] TheJesusaurus@piefed.ca 6 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

What if it's just a good joke from early in his career which resonates with people, and reposting some of his better work doesn't actually mean you're writing history

[–] Solumbran@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's advertising him, and why would you want to do that?

[–] TheJesusaurus@piefed.ca 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Assume I didn't know who Chappel was. How am supposed to know I'm not allowed to like this tweet?

[–] Solumbran@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Liking his tweet is one thing, reposting it is endorsing it, and it's generally a god idea to check who someone is before endorsing them

[–] TheJesusaurus@piefed.ca 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's still a good joke and it's still a poignant message. It doesn't become not those because Chapelle sucks.

[–] Solumbran@lemmy.world -2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

If you attribute it to him, yes it does.

[–] TheJesusaurus@piefed.ca 4 points 2 weeks ago

This is a stupid way to live

[–] MajorasTerribleFate@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

The problem comes in that there's no clean way to promote a tainted subject. We aren't out here talking about the (VERY) minor positive qualities in Hitler's pre-politics paintings, or whether Ronald Reagan had decent acting chops.

There are plenty of other, less-massively-problematic comedians, artists, politicians, actors, and other public figures to promote and laud the work of that we really can just set aside the possibly decent contributions of otherwise bad people. It just doesn't matter enough. Find someone cool who did a good thing and talk about that instead.

[–] TheJesusaurus@piefed.ca 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Is it promoting someone to laugh at an old joke? I don't think anyone is saying this makes Dave chappel good?

I happen to be familiar with chappels work but let's say I wasn't. Am I supposed to get this random tweets sources before I laugh to check if I'm allowed to enjoy this artist?

[–] MajorasTerribleFate@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The net negative reaction my comment received suggests I'm not well-placed to respond to your question.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Personally, I think ignoring that sort of complexity leaves you with a shallower understanding of the subject matter.

[–] MajorasTerribleFate@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I wouldn't say I'm ignoring it, but that I'm usually choosing not to publicly engage with it.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Hmm, that is fair