Mildly Interesting

26455 readers

189 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

marcar@lemmy.world

Jimbabwe@lemmy.ml

WhatsHerBucket@lemmy.world

Zerlyna@lemmy.world

52 Seestars Shooting at Once: 246 Hours of Exposure, and the Results Are Insane (www.youtube.com)

submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by BlueEther@no.lastname.nz to c/mildlyinteresting@lemmy.world

4 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I just stumbled across this in my feed, not sure why as I don't normally see astro stuff. But anyway I watched it all the way through.

Found it mildly interesting to use an array of (cheep?) commodity hardware and stacking

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] br3d@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

I recently bought a (different brand of) smart telescope and these things are great. Obviously the light-gathering capacity is much lower than traditional astrophotography setups, but the ease of use is incredible. Kudos to the engineers who make these things.