this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2026
80 points (97.6% liked)

World News

56836 readers
1881 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] riskable@programming.dev 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Corrupt law enforcement and politicians everywhere applaud your stance. As do factory farm owners, oil company executives, and the rich and powerful in general.

There should be no expectation of privacy in public places. Harassment is a separate but related issue, though.

I'm firmly in the camp of one-party consent laws. It's often the only way to hold people accountable for their actions. The rich and powerful shouldn't be able to sue someone for being recorded. Or worse, have the government act as their lap dogs with arrests.

[–] Mr_WorldlyWiseman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I agree with you. Filming evidence of a crime should always be legal. But I will say that posting negative videos of people to social media is considered libel in some countries. There's a line where freedom of speech ends and harassment begins.

I would say secretly recording a politician as they admit to corruption and sending it to journalists and the police is ok, but filming a politician when you ask them loaded opinion questions and then posting it to social media to dunk on them is not.

[–] riskable@programming.dev 1 points 2 months ago

but filming a politician when you ask them loaded opinion questions and then posting it to social media to dunk on them is not.

Why? That sounds like normal free speech. It's annoying and intrusive for sure but shouldn't be illegal.

You can't pre-empt speech like that. If you do, you're just enabling censorship and corruption.