this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2026
1113 points (99.8% liked)

Technology

84086 readers
2575 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
1113
Nintendo sued by players who say they should get any tariff refunds received by the US government (www.gamefile.news)
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by Deep@mander.xyz to c/technology@lemmy.world
165 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Two gamers have filed a class action lawsuit against Nintendo, alleging that the company will be unjustly enriching itself with any refund it secures from the U.S. government over widespread tariffs last year that, among other things, hiked the prices of Nintendo hardware and accessories.

“Unless restrained by this Court, Nintendo stands to recover the same tariff payments twice—once from consumers through higher prices and again from the federal government through tariff refunds, including interest paid by the government on those funds,” the suit states.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

That the government wants to give them a bag of money is a different matter from the price hike

It is not. They raised the prices precisely when the tariffs went into effect. There is no other plausible explanation as to the reason for the hike. You are licking corporate boot.

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Im not licking boot I did say it was morally not right. The suit just doesn’t have any legal ground to stand on especially not with the current admin.

[–] Rooster326@programming.dev -1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

There are literally Millions of other "plausible reasons" and they legally don't have to even have a reason.

"Market Conditions" is all they need to say.

I don't think it's fair, or right, or just, but it's how it works.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

And sometimes warehouses just catch on fire. I don't make the rules, that's just how it works 🤷‍♂️