this post was submitted on 17 Apr 2026
38 points (100.0% liked)

news

929 readers
1000 users here now

A lightweight news hub to help decentralize the fediverse load: mirror and discuss headlines here so the giant instance communities aren’t a single choke-point.

Rules:

  1. Recent news articles only (past 30 days)
  2. Title must match the headline or neutrally describe the content
  3. Avoid duplicates & spam (search before posting; batch minor updates).
  4. Be civil; no hate or personal attacks.
  5. No link shorteners
  6. No entire article in the post body

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bluGill@fedia.io 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Even if you have a futures contract, that contract is worthless if the goods don't exist. They can protect against the price going up, but if availability at any price is in question they are meaningless.

Also, if you have a contract it might still be in your best interest to sell the contract and not take the fuel at all.

[–] Laser@feddit.org 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

But the good does exist. It's not like all kerosene has vanished.

Also, if you have a contract it might still be in your best interest to sell the contract and not take the fuel at all.

Yes, I think this might have happened, might be more lucrative to resell rights to it.

[–] bluGill@fedia.io 2 points 2 weeks ago

Some exists. However there appears to be less than total demand. Somebody won't get some in that situation and if everyone has a contract to get it someone's contract will not be fulfilled. (most contracts also contain fine print about this situation)