Linux

13334 readers

616 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Ategon@programming.dev

anzo@programming.dev

dwraf_of_ignorance@programming.dev

X.Org X server and Xwayland security advisory released for multiple issues (www.gamingonlinux.com)

submitted 1 week ago by cm0002@lemy.lol to c/linux@programming.dev

12 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] MatSeFi@lemmy.liebeleu.de 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I know, I should not tell this publicly but... I route /96 subnets and assign single /128 addressed to virtual hosts inside my vpn. Sure than there is no auto configuration possible anymore (wich is THE killer feature in v6) bit I only have to pay for a single /64 block and all host can get a public v6 if needed.

[–] Scoopta@programming.dev 1 points 5 days ago

I'll be honest, less ugly than NAT which is really where I draw the line (I hate NAT), especially if they're charging you per /64, that's borderline diabolical from a hosting provider. If I was getting charged per /64 I'd probably route /96s too. Lack of SLAAC is unfortunate though.