this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2026
187 points (99.0% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

70251 readers
333 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

We heartily recommend visiting the free port of freemediaheckyeah (aka FMHY) while you sail the high seas, for all the freshest links the ocean has to offer.

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

🏴‍☠️ Other communities

FUCK ADOBE!

Torrenting/P2P:

Gaming:


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] chgxvjh@hexbear.net 61 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Not that it matters since this isn't going to get paid anyway but funny that the bulk of the judgement is to be paid to Spotify for building a shitty service rather than the rights holders of the music.

[–] Petter1@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 4 months ago

Yea, and it is ultimately Spotify who had an exploit that allowed the circumvention of DRM in the first place.

It is like Spotify is getting paid for having shitty tech that doesn’t do what it supposed to do correctly

[–] dansemacabreingalone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] Arcka@midwest.social 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

When you see this phrasing in English language, 'it' refers to the main subject of the preceding statement. In this case as a reply to the main post the subject is the "$322 Million Spotify Piracy Case".