Not The Onion

21218 readers

441 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

Links to news stories from...
...credible sources, with...
...their original headlines, that...
...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

kescusay@lemmy.world

490

Israelis are finally revolting against Netanyahu — for agreeing to the U.S. ceasefire with Iran (mondoweiss.net)

submitted 4 days ago by kingofras@lemmy.world to c/nottheonion@lemmy.world

198 comments fedilink hide all child comments

cross-posted from: https://news.abolish.capital/post/41590

The entire Israeli political spectrum is united in blasting Netanyahu for not continuing to attack Iran, and Israeli society agrees. The reason, to put it simply, is that Israelis are war junkies.

From Mondoweiss via This RSS Feed.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

US intelligence believe Iran isn’t aiming to build a nuke, but didn’t provide any source to that claim

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/6/20/trump-says-us-intelligence-wrong-about-iran-not-building-nuclear-bomb

Also, why should we stop at 90%? If tomorrow we’ll find proof Iran has enriched to 90%, you could claim “Well, they just enriched to 90% as a negotiation tool.

No I would not claim that. 90% is weapon grade enrichment, 60% is not

Oh, and your claim is somewhat self-contradictory - If it’s so clear Iran is enriching uranium as a negotiation tactic, doesn’t that make the tactic pointless?

Before the usa started the second aggression on Iran. Iran was willing to agree for zero enrichment proving again the point . Iran only enriching to 60% after Trump teared up the deal and Iran agreeing to zero enrichment . Those two evidence shows that Iran did not seek a nuke but to negotiate. The failure do not prove that it was just an excuse by Iran

[–] CerealKiller01@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/6/20/trump-says-us-intelligence-wrong-about-iran-not-building-nuclear-bomb

Sorry, "United States President Donald Trump has said..." isn't really a reliable source for me.

No I would not claim that. 90% is weapon grade enrichment, 60% is not

But 60% lacks any civilian uses, so the most obvious reason to go to 60% is because it's between 20% and 90%...

Those two evidence shows that Iran did not seek a nuke but to negotiate.

Now you're just switching arguments. That doesn't really address what I said about you argument being self-contradictory.

Anyway, I think I've learned all I can from you. Feel free to have the last word.

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Sorry, "United States President Donald Trump has said..." isn't really a reliable source for me

Yes trump is not a reliable source yet you agree with Him and spread his lie. The American intelligence is , it said Iran was not seeking a nuke

But 60% lacks any civilian uses, so the most obvious reason to go to 60% is because it's between 20% and 90%...

Again yes 60% for civilian has little civilian usage but can be used in negotiation

Now you're just switching arguments. That doesn't really address

I did not. Those two arguments shows that Iran was not seeking a nuke but rather was willing to give up enrichment

Anyway, I think I’ve learned all I can from you. Feel free to have the last word.

I learned that you are a zionist scum trying to manufacture consent for the USA and Israel aggression on Iran