this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2026
1296 points (97.4% liked)

Microblog Memes

11297 readers
2650 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] damnedfurry@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Your entire first comment boils down to “women should protest their inequalities in quieter ways”, so yeah.

You've completely fabricated that motive/intent, so yeah. Do you not know what "emphatically" means? I made it very clear that 'insufferability' has nothing to do with the 'loudness'/'disruptiveness' of the actions.

Why does it matter whether it’s recent or not?

Well for me, it mattered because at first glance, I thought I was having deja vu, because it looked familiar, and then I looked it up and realized that I saw it when it first went viral. That's the main reason I mentioned the year, after I realized.

But since you've apparently already decided I'm a sexist boogeyman, I doubt you'll accept the mundane reality of the situation, and will continue to convince yourself that I just Hate Women.

Now I'm almost certain that anecdote made you feel called out.

[–] sneakypersimmon@lemmy.today 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You’ve completely fabricated that motive/intent, so yeah. Do you not know what “emphatically” means? I made it very clear that ‘insufferability’ has nothing to do with the ‘loudness’ of the actions.

Women can protest their subjugation as long as they aren't insufferable about it.

Yeah, I understood your comment.

[–] damnedfurry@lemmy.world -3 points 1 day ago

Women can protest their subjugation as long as they aren’t insufferable about it.

They can regardless, but the fact is that being irritating for no reason is objectively counter-productive toward the cause. Also, there is a distinction to be made between being disruptive, and being insufferable; I use the latter word only to describe counter-productive disruption/aggression.

As an example, let’s take two hypothetical feminists, A and B.

They both actively campaign and gather support toward ending sex discrimination in hiring practices, with equivalent effort, as part of the same organization. But only B randomly accosts male strangers on the street, interrogating them about the sex ratio at their workplace, and chastising them if it isn’t at least 50% female, regardless of what line of work he is in, and without consideration for whether the person actually has any hiring power.

Is B doing a better job overall of furthering the cause than A, in your opinion?

One could consider workers conducting a sit-in at a workplace treating them unfairly, for example, to be very disruptive. But they're not being insufferable, because they're being disruptive where, and to whom, it matters, re serving their cause.

I'm sure you're fully prepared to interpret this comment as negatively as you can muster, but for others reading this, I hope this makes it very clear exactly what I'm saying, which is obviously not the sentiment Velma is characterizing me as having.