this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2026
626 points (99.5% liked)

politics

29335 readers
2640 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Donald Trump has promised to pardon his White House staffers, reported the Wall Street Journal’s Josh Dawsey in an exclusive report on Friday.

Dawsey, the veteran DC reporter, cited “people who have heard his comments” in the bombshell report revealing that Trump is asking his staff to operate with a sense of impunity.

“I’ll pardon everyone who has come within 200 feet of the Oval,” Trump reportedly told staffers “in a recent meeting to laughs.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] zd9@lemmy.world 40 points 1 day ago (4 children)

They can't be pardoned if people get upset enough and remove them

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 34 points 1 day ago (1 children)

A pardon doesn't magically suspend physics, that's for sure.

[–] kbobabob@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 13 hours ago

Bullet goes in, bullet goes out. You can't explain that

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago

That would require the repubilcan party to have a spine, and they gave that up a decade ago to better lick trumps "boots"

[–] apftwb@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If impeachment goes to trial in the Senate and it looks like it might not go well for him, he will make sure everyone is pardoned before he is removed from office.

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

republicans will make a show of it but ultimately they won't vote to remove him. They're complicit and they're absolutely wallowing in the fact that they can do whatever they want as long as they convince everyone it was his idea.

[–] Hapankaali@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What are the odds of people getting "upset enough" about this, but not about putting your shitter full of top secret documents and getting away with it scot-free?

[–] zd9@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The interesting thing about child rape, is that it activates the completely unhinged QAnon-esque people, who actually do commit violence with glee. Though I disagree with them on many things, we just happen to be aligned on "child rape=bad". That crime creates a visceral reaction that "stealing and selling state secrets" doesn't quite emit.

So I feel like Epstein is the one thing that could actually get through to many in MAGA cult.

[–] Hapankaali@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago

Okay, but do QAnon folks associate child rape with Trump or his administration? A tiny majority maybe, but most are still mainlining the Kool-Aid.

Most Christians are vehemently opposed to many things approved of in the Bible, but it doesn't seem to bother them much.

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

So I feel like Epstein is the one thing that could actually get through to many in MAGA cult.

Too bad the majority will find a way to justify it rather than admit they supported everything they hated. Calling it now, "Trump had to rape those kids, how else could he have gotten in with those people to take them down?"

[–] andxz@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

As long as it's talking or writing about it people will find a way to justify it or just ignore it for sure.

It'd be a different thing altogether if some VHS tape of him and a crying child happened to appear. That'd turn all but the most vehemently ghoulish people against even him. There'd be no coming back from that. Some might say deepfake this and that but it'd still have an impact.

Probably why some survivors/witnesses simply disappeared. Probably why Melania did her little stunt the other day. Probably why Maxwell is still breathing, too. If someone stashed some tapes it would've been her. She had too much to lose. Nobody is truly untouchable when state actors are involved.

[–] zd9@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

It'll always be a game of percentages. There will always be some amount of hardcore cult members, but as worse and worse things come to light, the new info will pick off sections of MAGA one piece at a time. We can debate percentages, but I think a critical mass of MAGA would leave if they had crystal clear proof of Trump raping children.

One source I'm using is The Necessary Conversation youtube podcast, and while it's just two data points, it give the regular person a really good insight into the cult.