this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2026
1 points (100.0% liked)
SpacePics
979 readers
1 users here now
A community dedicated to sharing high quality images of space and the cosmos
Rules:
Include some context in the title (such as the name of the astronomical object or location where it was photographed)
Only images, pictures, collages, albums, and gifs are allowed. Please link images from high quality sources ([Imgur](imgur.com), [NASA](https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/archivepix.html), [ESA](https://www.esa.int/ESA_Multimedia/Images), [Flickr](Flickr.com), [500px ](500px.com), etc.) Videos, interactive images/websites, memes, and articles are not allowed
Only submit images related to space. This may include pictures of space, artwork of space, photoshopped images of space, simulations, artist’s depictions, satellite images of Earth, or other related images
Be civil to one another
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Yeah, that's the human-defined part I was referring to. I could've spoken more clearly. The Earth's electromagnetic field is obviously a real thing with a real, measurable orientation; it's why compasses work. I wasn't saying "the line along which the compass needle lies is human-defined"*, but rather that the end of the needle we choose to paint red and collectively define as "up" on Earth's 2-sphere surface is human-defined. There are real, understandable societal and historical factors that play into why the North Pole is "up", but this photo is only upside-down from the collective notion that the South Pole is "down" rather than "up".
"From the perspective of the widely accepted social construct" is thus the only thing they would've realistically meant.
* I know the terrestrial and magnetic poles diverge somewhat. Close enough for a discussion of "upside-downness".