this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2026
1071 points (97.9% liked)

People Twitter

9826 readers
615 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It’s not a contradiction to want to see Afghanistan restored to how it was pre-Soviet invasion; the US is arguably just as responsible as the USSR was for Afghanistan’s fall into religious fundamentalism, due to abandoning its reconstruction following the fall of the Soviet Union.

Undoing that level of cultural damage takes a long time, in order to ensure subsequent generations aren’t radicalised. So while it does suck, it would have taken at least another generation of occupation to shape a more democratic and progressive future for Afghanistan.

Unfortunately, the US isn’t as good at nation building as it once was - it’s actually not as good at a lot of things, as it once was.

[–] toad@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

Ah yes because white liberal democracy are actually at the forefront of progress /s

[–] toad@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

The US never was good. They never built a nation any more than the brits built australia. They colonised it.