Technology
News community around technology, social media platforms, information technology and governmental policy surrounding it.
What doesn't fit here?
The core of the story has to be technology focused.
- If article mentions "AI" in a sentence and then talks about business economics that doesn't make it tech news.
- Gaming is too many layers removed from technology. There are many dedicated communities that are a better fit for it.
- Transporation is too many layers removed from technology. EVs while use many cool technologies have many dedicated communities that are a better fit for it.
- Entertainment is too many layers removed from technology. While sometimes it can fit here, business or cultural aspects of it are a better fit for dedicated communities.
- Cybersecurity. While it heavily focuses on technology, most of the time it's too technical for most people who are not already invested in it. Should be posted in a dedicated communities unless it has broader connection to other tech areas.
Post guidelines
Title format
Post title should mirror the news source title. If you don't like the title of article, look for an alternative source instead of editorializing it.
URL format
Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
[Opinion] prefix
Opinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title. Opinion articles refer to articles that their publisher doesn't explictly endorse.
Country prefix
Country prefix can be added to the title with a separator (|, :, etc.) if the news is from a local publisher who doesn't clearly mention the country.
Rules
1. English only
Title and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original link
Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communication
All communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. Inclusivity
Everyone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacks
Any kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangents
Stay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may apply
If something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.
Companion communities
!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip
Icon attribution | Banner attribution
If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.
view the rest of the comments
Google originally claimed to be privacy focused, too, until the incentives to enshittify became too great.
Use open source if you want privacy.
The open source version isn't E2E encrypted fyi
Can you provide more info on this? It looks like they built Meet with the MLS protocol, and unless I'm missing something, that should be E2EE and it should work on any client (regardless of the server)
I was basing it off the top comment here which said "They’ve just rebranded La Suite Meet" (which isn't E2E) but it looks like that person might have just been talking out their ass anyway.
Its so obvious they want to become the next google its cringe. Friends dont let friends use proton slop.
Dude, so edgy calling proton slop. I think for what they're doing, its great to make a full suite of apps to help users ditch Google! So many people won't jump the Google, Microsoft, or Apple ship until there are direct enough replacements to all the apps they used. Plus, I feel you're just jumping on the 'hate proton' bandwagon from other posts* without providing any real reasoning... Go back to reddit with that sheep brain mentality.
Also, they (Proton) understand there are those who refuse to pay no matter how good services might be, so their targeting businesses also make sense! They have grown enough they can handle scaling for business customers, and they're paying customers to help keep personal tier stuff free for this who keep it at that. There's probably not many US companies trying to ditch US tech, but there are certainly a shit ton of EU companies ditching* US tech to either use LibreOffice or others, so it's a perfect position to offer Docs and Sheets replacements too (which they have).
I don't know if they're taking old Google apps and just stripping Google devices out of them or coding from some other FOSS fork, but they're using a lot of the same naming conventions (maybe to keep simple).
Personally, Proton IS who I push friends and family to because of the privacy focus, it's a sort of 1-stop shop replacement for everything so it's far easier to switch. Think about it... 1 account to change to vs many, with support if trouble, and is available in multiple languages, countries, platforms, etc. Why would you not share them with family? Not everybody is obsessed with privacy in the first place, so many are still blind to the data harvesting or just don't care enough. Proton helps make it more convincing to switch and protect those people. I think it make sense.
You'd hate any legitimate alternative that got popular