this post was submitted on 23 Mar 2026
183 points (98.9% liked)

pics

28281 readers
3 users here now

Rules:

1.. Please mark original photos with [OC] in the title if you're the photographer

2..Pictures containing a politician from any country or planet are prohibited, this is a community voted on rule.

3.. Image must be a photograph, no AI or digital art.

4.. No NSFW/Cosplay/Spam/Trolling images.

5.. Be civil. No racism or bigotry.

Photo of the Week Rule(s):

1.. On Fridays, the most upvoted original, marked [OC], photo posted between Friday and Thursday will be the next week's banner and featured photo.

2.. The weekly photos will be saved for an end of the year run off.

Weeks 2023

Instance-wide rules always apply. https://mastodon.world/about

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Jerkingass@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Does this continue to work at scale? Making everything proportional and such... I would guess they had to significantly increase the jet propulsion to compensate.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Nothing in the world really works at infinite scale because the size of atoms doesn’t change. In order for something to scale infinitely it also needs the environment in which it’s found to scale along with it.

Fun fact, the reason bees can fly is because, at their scale, the air is so thick that they’re actually doing something closer to swimming through it. A plane 6x as big would be, conversely, flying through incredibly thin air from its perspective.

[–] Paranoidfactoid@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This comment doesn't actually answer OP's aeronautics engineering question at scales of human life and plane manufacturing.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Who’s talking about scales of human life? He wanted to know if one could just keep scaling planes and what that would require, and since no else had said anything I gave what answer I could which did contain some helpful information on that subject.

[–] Paranoidfactoid@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

No, he didn't. Nobody is talking about scaling airplanes down to atomic or up to galactic scales. There's an actual answer to OP's question, which an aeronautical engineer could factually provide. You gave a worthless, 'I am very smart' non-answer and now double down as if OP was asking about some platonic ideal rather than a genuine engineering question.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Damn, somebody’s having a shit day, huh? You know this kind of negativity isn’t good for you, right?

[–] 42beansinapod@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Since no one actually answered your question: basically yes, you can just scale airplanes linearely up and down. Obviously everything has to scale, like propultion and hydrolics power, but you can esentially make a model aircraft the exact same shape as any large aircraft and it will fly. Conversly, you can test a small model in a wind tunnel and then scale it up as much as you want and it behaves mostly the same way.

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reynolds_number

Not technically true, but I think when you are scaling up from an A380, it becomes much less relevant.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I would assume at some point you would have to worry about structural materials being able to hold up to weight being thrown around. It is remarkable how much wings can bend, but I figure at some point joints would need some kind of alternative.

Some are designed to have ~25ft (8 meters) of bend in the wings.

[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Look at the size difference between the engines.

The A380's are enormous.

[–] Zak@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They're only about 10-15% more powerful. The 777 has far larger and more powerful engines, but only two of them.

[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 1 points 1 month ago

Yeah. Those are huge on the 777.