UK Politics

5621 readers

278 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

tom@feddit.uk

GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk

flamingos@feddit.uk

frankPodmore@slrpnk.net

Starmer’s position on Iran pleases no one, but that is because there are no good options (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 5 months ago by moderatecentrist@feddit.uk to c/uk_politics@feddit.uk

10 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Thoughts? The article says that Britain can't annoy the US too much over this Iran war, because UK security is unfortunately completely dependent upon the US.

Starmer has to deploy what influence he has with the White House carefully. He must consider other strategic goals – the need to keep Trump onside in Ukraine, for example. And he must be mindful that Britain’s own military and intelligence capabilities are enmeshed with Pentagon systems.

As one [minister] puts it, Britain would be “massively exposed” if a capricious US administration decided it no longer wanted our friendship.

Perhaps the best way for the UK to stop being a vassal of the US is for the UK to join forces with its European allies. Europe together can surely create the capabilities needed to defend the continent.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 3 points 5 months ago

Other people addressed the idiocy of calling that "vassalhood".

It is a fact though that throwing your lot in with others is a risk - a risk that they do something stupid, like the US keeps doing, and dragging you with them. A risk that when you come to rely on them, they don't show up, as the US is doing in Ukraine and has implied it would do in case of a Russian attack on another member of NATO. That shows the importance of being aligned with your allies.

The fact is, we are far more aligned with EU countries than we are with the US when it comes to foreign policy - what comes of geographically being in Europe. It may not be true together, in which case reliance on those countries could be a problem, but isolationism is a far bigger problem.