Programmer Humor

33837 readers

1375 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

Keep content in english
No advertisements
Posts must be related to programming or programmer topics
- If the mod doesn't find it funny, you're banned. Ha-ha!... For real: do not use the community for "statements". There are other places for such content. Keep it chill and funny.

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

anzo@programming.dev

Feyter@programming.dev

BurningTurtle@programming.dev

pylapp@programming.dev

721

Node Modules (lemmy.ml)

submitted 1 year ago by cm0002@lemmy.world to c/programmer_humor@programming.dev

54 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Shanmugha@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah. JS is okay with lots of funny (and not fun) type coercions (toString on everything? really?), has no notion of reference as data type, but somehow automatic iteration on array by "==" operator is too much

You are right, that's not want I would want from it, it is bad, I will never like that. And you are also right there are things even worse than this, no question there

Edit: "implementing iteration on == would have been too much" is an invalid argument, if anyone had doubts