Selfhosted

60054 readers

979 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.
No spam.
Posts here are to be centered around self-hosting. Please ensure it is clear in your post how it relates to self-hosting.
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or git here. Just post the link for folks to click.
Submission headline should match the article title.
No trolling.

Resources:

selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
awesome-selfhosted software
awesome-sysadmin resources
Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

curbstickle@anarchist.nexus

curbstickle_lw@lemmy.world

Synology could bring “certified drive” requirements to more NAS devices (arstechnica.com)

submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by otter@lemmy.ca to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

19 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Synology's telegraphed moves toward a contained ecosystem and seemingly vertical integration are certain to rankle some of its biggest fans, who likely enjoy doing their own system building, shopping, and assembly for the perfect amount of storage. "Pro-sumers," homelab enthusiasts, and those with just a lot of stuff to store at home, or in a small business, previously had a good reason to buy one Synology device every so many years, then stick into them whatever drives they happened to have or acquired at their desired prices. Synology's stated needs for efficient support of drive arrays may be more defensible at the enterprise level, but as it gets closer to the home level, it suggests a different kind of optimization.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] redpandabeer@feddit.org 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Actually perfect timing (for me, it's all in all terrible)... I was about to buy myself a NAS and struggled to figure out which to get, and this removes at least one option.

[–] draenog@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

As I read this, I am just transfering over to TrueNas on totally open hardware (from Synology). After 1 week, I am loving it. A bit of a learning curve, but TrueNas seems really nice and solid.

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Honestly if you're comfortable with Linux I just built my own at this point, but if you're not then obviously don't take my advice

[–] redpandabeer@feddit.org 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah, I daily Linux, so I wouldn't mind. It's just that I want a decently sleek system with less risk of making a mistake when it comes to what I'd want to store. (I follow the 3-2-1 on important files anyway thought)