Asklemmy

55716 readers

230 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 7 years ago

MODERATORS

Should I join "free speech" alternatives? (lemmy.ml)

submitted 2 years ago by sinewyshadow@lemmy.ml to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

10 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Hello! I've been searching for a reddit alternative, and yes, I've picked Lemmy and Raddle, but here's the thing. My morbid curiosity is perked up, and a part of me wants to join the "free speech" alternatives, like Saidit, Poal, etc. What's wrong with me that I want to join toxic places? I mean, yes I'll find a whole new perspective (albeit wrong), on political topics, but a part of me wants to be the antagonist, and post lefty memes, and music with a left-leaning message (bands from r/rabm) I know that's like kicking the hornet's nest, so you don't need to start in with "that's a bad idea" I know it is. My main point/question is, is it wrong to join a site with potential hate speech? Does it make someone a bad person?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

It potentially opens you up to radicalization in the wrong direction.

[–] Vendetta9076@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Generally radicalization in any direction is bad.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Why? Shouldn't the measure of good and bad be with respect to how correct it is, not how closely the position aligns with the status quo?

[–] Carighan@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The word implies an unhealthy and incorrect degree. Otherwise you're not radicalized, just representing an opinion.