this post was submitted on 13 Jan 2026
678 points (99.3% liked)

politics

31421 readers
2988 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

An impeachment effort against Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Kristi Noem will "move forward," members of Congress are promising, after the effort was announced last week in the wake of an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officer fatally shooting a United States citizen in Minneapolis.

"We're gonna move forward to impeach Kristi Noem," Representative Angie Craig, a Minnesota Democrat, vowed during an interview with MS Now on Sunday.

In a press release, Democratic Representative Robin Kelly‘s office said that the 3 articles of impeachment would allege Noem "abused her office for personal benefit and steered federal dollars to associates," "willfully obstructed Congressional oversight and withheld Congressionally appropriated funds in violation of her constitutional oath and federal law" and "compromised public safety, violated due process of American citizens, and directed unconstitutional actions."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 96 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

So most of us remember Noem's main claim to fame being that she executed her new puppy, after... not training it properly, and being annoyed by it.

Well I'd like to remind folks she was behind this ad campaign:

Nope, not a joke, not a photoshop, not AI hallucination... this was her baby, and it was real.

Finally... I present to you, ~~Kristi~~ Karen Noem:

Yeah thats from ~7 years ago, when she still had a vaguely human face.

If memory serves... she is still, herself, personally banned from setting foot on any Indian/Native Tribal land in the entire state of South Dakota, basically for consistently being a racist c*nt, consistently disrespecting any and all tribal attempts to keep their land clean from industrial waste.

EDIT:

(I've been told by a local from Rapid City that she also executed a goat in a similar violent outburst as with her new puppy... but I have not been able to verify this myself, with a citable print source.

Local told me that its not uncommon to basically just rent a or some goats as basically au naturale lawnmowers, which does make sense to me...

... but she apparently got annoyed by the bleating, and one day just shot someone else's goat, that she was renting, to be a lawnmower on her ranch.

... Yeah.)

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 28 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The goat story was in her book, as an extension of the puppy story. Once she shot the puppy in the face, she was all wound up on bloodlust, and decided to shoot the goat, too, because she thought it was disgusting.

MAGAs think that's funny.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 9 months ago

... wow.

Ok.

I thought some local may have been passing along a tall tale, fucking, nope, there is a print source, and it is Noem herself.

... yeah I haven't read her book.

This woman is a portrait of a violent antisocial psychopath.

Like, if you were poor, and you did this kind of shit, you'd get either imprisoned or institutionalized.

She also clearly has body dysmorphia, as demonstrated by her ... can we just call it 'Fox News Face' - affirming care?

[–] whitecollarcry@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 9 months ago (1 children)

tips patriotism hat highly ironically

[–] Gonzako@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Hey! Patriotism today means fighting for a sFer America. You ARE being patriotic by informing us of the failures of the state

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Yeah I got my issues with America, but I'm a true believer in the enlightenment and I love that this country is philosophically grounded in enlightenment ideas and the idea that the state's ability to project force onto it's citizens should be limited. I know about our contradictions, and I'm disappointed as all hell in what we've done with ourselves in the past decades (and longer), but part of me loves this country and believes it could be better.

But first and foremost I'm an international anti fascist. I don't care that I love my home, it's fallen to the fascists and is attacking the world, I can love it again once it's been stopped.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

stumbles awkwardly out of recently materialized 80s era phone booth

dons tricorner hat

checks breast pocket for printed copy of ancient proto proto anarchist zine, 'Common Sense'

brings out boombox

"Let us commence to jam, sucka!"

hits play on RATM: Renegades of Funk, extremely patriotically