this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2025
1 points (100.0% liked)

Dating

432 readers
1 users here now

A community for discussing dating.

No product promotion. No memes. No gender war nonsense.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Hello all!

I have had this project in the works for a while and it's time to go public and start getting Opinions. Do you feel poorly-served by the current offerings for meeting people online? Do you think there could be a better way?

Maybe you'd like to read about ours, and maybe even try a demonstration of some of its USPs?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It's a good idea, but some of the ideas around visibility controls seem incompatible with federation and openness. Any federated system has the possibility of interacting with incomplete implementations.

Your idea of message moderation seems well intentioned, but it would make E2EE impossible to implement.

Also anything like this where geography matters will need a way to reach critical mass quickly.

[โ€“] Funkster@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 7 months ago

I'm of the opinion that E2EE is outside the scope of this - since as you say it would preclude moderation, which is needed to keep users safe. Once people have found each other and are happy to exit the moderated system, the recommendation would be to move to some other E2EE messaging platform of their choice.

I'm not sure I understand your concern about visibility controls, since the control would always be done at the source end it doesn't matter if the receiving end is incomplete - it just gets what it gets. Perhaps you could clarify?

Of course, critical mass is a very difficult problem. My hope is that the federated nature of it means that each instance can focus on its geographical area and do targeted marketing to achieve that mass locally, rather than trying to launch and market worldwide.