this post was submitted on 14 Dec 2025
332 points (99.7% liked)
science
27328 readers
232 users here now
A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.
dart board;; science bs
rule #1: be kind
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
According to your link and the linked Wikipedia article, that word includes the non-human great apes, which seems rather unfair. It's only the genus homo within the family of hominids who discovered fire. "Human" is probably fine, depending on the exact definition used it can definitely include our direct ancestor species while excluding chimpanzees. But it can definitely also be understood to mean specifically homo sapiens, so there's a lot of potential for misunderstandings.
If you click on the link to "Hominini" in the Wiktionary article, it says "Hominini - A taxonomic tribe within the family Hominidae – humans; or the chimpanzees and humans."
Granted, that's different from what I said, as it's only the chimpanzees that might be included, but according to Wiktionary it just isn't clear cut.
it also notes that chimpanzees are not always included within hominini
has noone ever told a chimp to make fire? like with a lighter?
There's a whole line of movies about this concept
Sheesh, these are tough—sounds the same but has different meanings. Didn’t know that problem went so far back.