this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2025
567 points (97.8% liked)

Selfhosted

62034 readers
410 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

  1. Be civil.

  2. No spam.

  3. Posts are to be related to self-hosting.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title.

  6. No trolling.

  7. Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details. Tags [CBH] or [AIP] are required, see the links in Rule 8 for details.

  8. AI-related discussions and AI-involved promotional posts have additional requirements for tagging, as noted in Rule 7 and the AI & Promotional Post Expanded Rules post, and find example disclosures here.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Bob_Robertson_IX@lemmy.world 23 points 9 months ago (3 children)

This isn't true, a lot of corporations use and benefit from the foss and they should be supporting those projects.

They should also be supporting projects that could replace the applications that they spend millions on each year. When your CIO says that they are using 'whatever corpo system' because a viable open source project doesn't exist, they should start funding the non-viable projects so they can become viable.

[–] Mondez@lemdro.id 23 points 9 months ago

Worse they often report issues that affect them but still don't commit resources to resolving those issues.

[–] ieGod@lemmy.zip 2 points 9 months ago (2 children)

they should be supporting those projects

As long as the end user is abiding by the licensing terms it shouldn't be an expectation that any additional support is coming from anywhere. This is the nature of foss. The contributors should know this.

[–] Novocirab@feddit.org 8 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Licensing terms only govern the legal aspects, not social and moral aspects.

[–] ieGod@lemmy.zip 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Of course, but as we know there is no universal agreements for either. The expectations are ill placed.

[–] tabular@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

We don't need the madman who thinks suffering is good to change their mind for sensible people to act, as medicine doesn't need the madman who thinks always throwing up is healthy. We place expectations on others everyday: like when we walk past a stranger. Perfect agreement is not needed to have expectations, or demand better from those who benefit from others.

Then use a noncommercial licence.

[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

The problem is, I feel like more recent MBA lessons tell people that the "rising tide that lifts all ships" is a business death sentence, for reasons unexplained. Many of them now would rather sink the whole ocean if they believe that their business will sink a little bit less.