this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2025
346 points (98.1% liked)

Fuck Cars

15904 readers
96 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Guadin@k.fe.derate.me 14 points 8 months ago (2 children)

A max vehicle tonnage won't work since you need to exempt trucks and delivery vans (or change a couple of things drastically). So you could say that when something is used for work/delivery they are exempt and all others have a max tonnage. But since these guys buy and register it as a work vehicle, they will not be hit by the max tonnage.

[–] Eq0@literature.cafe 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Would imposing a limit on the ratio of useable volume/volume be reasonable ? Or hight off the road?

I don’t want fewer of these beasts, I want them gone. They are absurdly dangerous with no net benefit (offroading? Seriously??)

[–] birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Maybe an easier one would be mandating that cars should not be allowed to have open-air transport areas, for safety reasons such as transport not sticking out, pedestrian safety, and so on. Since it's possible to stick out with those pickups, that automatically prohibits cars

What also can be added, is abolishing the lease for SUVs altogether, and prohibiting the import and building of those that are taller, longer, wider, and heavier than certain dimensions (say 4 by 1.8 by 1.5 m), even for work.

Mandate that people sell them. Those who bought the SUVs before 1 January 2025, then can get a subsidy of 25% off for the new car, if it's more energy efficient, smaller and lighter, and doesn't have an open rear. Or, they can get 50% off for a bike (electric, transport, or whatever, but no fatbike).

[–] Eq0@literature.cafe 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

But it’s possible to stick out from any car? I think I am not understanding correctly what you mean

[–] birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

With those pickup trucks, they have a large open back. The open back can be considered part of the car itself. If you put a long plank on there, it can stick out, and that's deadly for other drivers and pedestrians.

With vans, it can only ever be enclosed, and that's safer.

[–] Eq0@literature.cafe 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

That would ban all pickup trucks but still allow huge SUVs with similar build. I don’t think that would solve much of the problem

[–] birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Maybe then the tonnage, length/height/width too?

Or alternatively, tax cars according to length/height/width, tonnage, energy efficiency, and % space left unused. Obviously, the car also has to adhere to safety regulations before being allowed on the road.

The smaller the car, the lower the tonnage, the more energy efficient, the better.

For space usage, you could say that it needs to have space for 2-6 passengers, all having seats with enough leg space. The 'storage' space may not take up more than 20% of the car's inner volume, and must be fully covered.

We also need to look at the supply chains and see what would incentivise car companies to support these moves.

[–] brotundspiele@feddit.org 6 points 8 months ago

I guess, these things weigh more than 3.5 tons. In Germany that means that you would need a truck driver's license to drive them. That license alone costs 3000-5000€ and you have to pass a medical test every few years to keep it. You also need a digital driver's card which, combined with a digital tachograph permanently stores your speed and your driving times. You'll be treated like a professional truck driver, so you can't drive for more than 9 hours per day, have to have an 11 hour break every night and at least a 45 hour break once a week. In practice that means that you can't use your vehicle after 8pm if you drive to work at 7 in the morning and you can't really use it on the weekend etc.

That's enough of a hassle to deter most of the people from getting such a car so much that I rarely ever see them here.

For delivery vans that's no problem because they have to adhere to these limits anyway, because of workers protection rights.