this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2025
1 points (100.0% liked)

Apple

20497 readers
4 users here now

Welcome

to the largest Apple community on Lemmy. This is the place where we talk about everything Apple, from iOS to the exciting upcoming Apple Vision Pro. Feel free to join the discussion!

Rules:
  1. No NSFW Content
  2. No Hate Speech or Personal Attacks
  3. No Ads / Spamming
    Self promotion is only allowed in the pinned monthly thread

Lemmy Code of Conduct

Communities of Interest:

Apple Hardware
Apple TV
Apple Watch
iPad
iPhone
Mac
Vintage Apple

Apple Software
iOS
iPadOS
macOS
tvOS
watchOS
Shortcuts
Xcode

Community banner courtesy of u/Antsomnia.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
MichelleG@lemmy.world
RoyalEngineering@lemmy.world
thisisdee@lemmy.world
1
Who is the iPhone Air for? (feddit.org)
submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by Ulrich@feddit.org to c/apple_enthusiast@lemmy.world
60 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Maybe I'm just out of touch, but I don't understand who this is for, and I think it's going to flop.

First of all...who is asking for thinner phones?

Secondly, the price. This is not an Air SE. This thing is only $100 less than a full-fat iPhone Pro, and $200 more than iPhone base (which is a particularly good value this year).

And what do you get for that price?

  • 2 fewer lenses than the pro, and 1 fewer than the base
  • Titanium frame, I guess?
  • Less powerful processor than the base
  • Inherently more fragile frame
  • Less battery life than even the base model (this was often cited as the shortcoming of the iphone Mini)
  • Slower charging speed than both models
  • no cinematic video mode

Are people really clamoring for thinner phones so badly that they'll spend more money for less features?

https://www.apple.com/iphone/compare/?modelList=iphone-17-pro%2Ciphone-air%2Ciphone-17

Edit: 1 week later and the Air underperforms the base model as well (as expected)

Also someone pointed out below that the 16e is only 2 grams heavier and is $400 cheaper.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FlatFootFox@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago

It’s smaller and lighter. This is not most people’s top priority, but it’s enough to move the needle on some demographics. Folks with bad wrists are incredibly psyched for a phone they chill on a sofa for a long period of time with, and it turns out there are a lot of folks on the planet who’s pants have distressingly small pockets. It’s not a device with universal appeal and that’s fine.