this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2025
79 points (95.4% liked)

Open Source

47804 readers
51 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Is there any actual easy to use foss chat app my friends and SO could use ? Everyone uses fb messenger because its so easy. I cant find anything easy enough to make people switch to, that won't have issues and send them running back to zucc

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] int32@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

check out https://soatok.blog/2025/01/14/dont-use-session-signal-fork/ and https://soatok.blog/2025/01/20/session-round-2/ . session doesn't even have PFS(perfect forward secrecy), which can be very useful, so if a key is cracked, then only a few messages can be decrypted. EDIT: that was a lot of typos!

[–] blurb@sh.itjust.works 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I would also use Signal instead, but Session's situation is not that bad unless one needs to accommodate the CIA or Mossad as part of their threat model, in which case I think SimpleX would be a better option. This is also in the article you posted:

Edit: I didn't notice that the original commenter had said they "switched from Signal" at first, which is definitely worse.

[–] crash_thepose@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Why would simplex be better in that case?

[–] blurb@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The lack of PFS and 256bit encryption in Session is a little concerning, and one other advantage of SimpleX is that it has no unique identifiers at all while Session uses random IDs and Signal requires a phone number.

[–] crash_thepose@lemmy.ml 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I thought signal doesn't require a phone number anymore ?

[–] blurb@sh.itjust.works 4 points 10 months ago

It still does, but they did add a username system so you don't need someone's phone number to contact them.

[–] WilliamA@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Thanks. Yk a secure replacement?

[–] int32@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I like XMPP, but there's also LXMF(a bit more experimental, only for 'advanced' users) or simply signal or simplex.

[–] WilliamA@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago

Alright, thanks