this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2025
259 points (98.9% liked)

News

37511 readers
302 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] djcas9@feed.djcas9.com -3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

"describing what you did" didn't I just say this? Yea, go into court and describe it your way. Let me know how that works out. Not sure i follow on the rest.. but sure, do whatever. I said i respectfully disagree. You insisted on telling me how you felt about my approach - never commented about you personally. Its outside of the scope of this conversation.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

how you felt about my approach

Again with your emotional language. How about what I think about it? Because idk about you, but I was sharing my thoughts. Seems like you were projecting about your feelings, though.

never commented about you personally

Oh, you just called me emotional, but whatever. You sure didn't do the thing you claimed you didn't do.

Its outside of the scope of this conversation.

You think? Glad you found a way to feel like the bigger person there. Really showing by example.

[–] djcas9@feed.djcas9.com -3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Fine "think" not sure why the salience of that word is so important to you. I called you emotional? No, I didn't (you said above "your emotional language." lol). How do you get emotion from the word "feel"? I can feel current.. Is current emotion? sigh Once again, last part escapes me. You are connecting dots that don't exist to make a point that is subjective. You call me arrogant but you are trying to force me to accept your analysis of myself. That's wild arrogant. I'm just blunt. Also, when someone says feel.. that's their observation (kind of like you keep saying "your emotional language."). You don't get to control that. Feel me? lol Why I didn't dismiss you calling me it. How can I? I'm not you.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

You're reflecting language patterns I've seen in people who are projecting their emotions by accusing others of them. And if you quack and walk like a duck, I'm going to conclude you are one without getting bogged down by pedantic details. I've been randomly accused of being emotional a few times and then described in those terms, trying to frame me through that lens with every interaction. Feelings and emotions are not too far apart, and that's not a huge mystery to be pretending like you don't understand the connection. Sorry if that's not the case, but you were behaving in a certain way.

you are trying to force me to accept your analysis of myself

Forcing you? Don't confuse replying to messages in my inbox and standing my ground with you being at the center of my world. I don't care what you think or who you are, but I do care that you're acting like an arrogant asshole with a better-than-thou attitude when people are not behaving like self-taught savants with a million bucks to throw at some random website for their own personal CRISPR starter kits just so they can correct beliefs about vaccines that they do not have.

[–] djcas9@feed.djcas9.com -3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

"I’ve seen in people" lol then talk about projection.. Can you have a logical none bias conversation? You are consumed by your opinion, what you see, how you read it. You are fighting yourself. .. name calling.. child like behavior.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

"I’ve seen in people" lol

I clarified in the next sentence that they were all direct replies to me. And you dare comment on me fixating on the "salience" of a word? Give me a fucking break, dude.

Can you have a logical none bias conversation?

Can you not write a sentence without some stupid loaded language? Because that's all you've been doing lately.

You are fighting yourself. .. name calling.. child like behavior.

Helloooo, kettle. Talk about emotions some more! Want me to link you to your comment that started all this? Did you forget who broke decorum first?