this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2025
840 points (99.0% liked)

politics

31349 readers
2722 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Edit: as pointed out in a comment below, the official cause is coding error

Compare with the original, from a few weeks back

Half of section 8, governing Congressional power over the military is removed.

Section 9 had, among other things:

  • Habeas Corpus the right to get a court hearing instead of arbitrary imprisonment
  • a ban on foreign emoluments for the US officials (eg: payments from foreign governments)

Section 10 reserved foreign policy for the federal government instead of the states.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 73 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Holy shit, it’s indexed in search engines but 404s:

https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/article-1/section-9/

Removed here too:

https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/article-1/

Here are sections 9/10 on another government website, just to make sure I’m not crazy: https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/constitution-transcript#1-9

[–] wetbeardhairs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 49 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah that pretty much confirms it wasn't just a text based whoopsie. Which... there's no real reason to be modifying the contents of that page anyways. Even the browse article 1 section no longer has links to section 9 or 10.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I mean… they could be automated indexes and something got accidentally deleted from a database?

I am playing devils advocate and grasping at straws here, though. The implications are also profoundly stupid (especially since other .gov websites are intact).

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 32 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Except that going to Article 8...

https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/article-1/section-8/

Article 8 ends at Clause 12 about the Army. In the original there are 18 Clauses.

So it's not just that 9 and 10 are gone, the details for 8 stop at the exact same point!

That's really getting into deeply unlikely to be an accident territory.

[–] wetbeardhairs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yeah that would make sense to automate if the text was changing frequently. But ... it's not.

[–] VeryVito@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I see what you did there

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Could still be some standard database.

Again, I emphasize, I am grasping at straws here… An accident or corruption like this would be an incredible coincidence.

[–] memfree@piefed.social 11 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Help! I tried to archive https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/article-1/ -- but it won't show up in archive.org. It tells me I can go to:

Did the government break wayback, too?

[–] GuyFawkes@midwest.social 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I thought I read an article recently about the government taking over one of the archive sites.

[–] memfree@piefed.social 2 points 1 year ago

It isn't part of the government, but was designated an official federal depository library . There are over 1000 such libraries, but archive.org is the most 'digital'.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I can't get it to work either.

[–] Venus_Ziegenfalle@feddit.org 10 points 1 year ago

That's what they got up to while everybody was busy with the Epstein stuff.