this post was submitted on 21 Apr 2025
2 points (100.0% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

69042 readers
1271 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

🏴‍☠️ Other communities

FUCK ADOBE!

Torrenting/P2P:

Gaming:


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Looking for a place to find the Windows version of this without paying $20 for a single version or $5/month for regular updates

EDIT: which one of you mad lads did this? https://codeberg.org/WetOtter44/StrawberryMusicPlayer

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pablodaniel@lemmings.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

"Access to macOS and Windows releases are currently restricted to sponsors, a 5 USD monthly sponsorship is required."

Really scummy on their part.

You should be able to build from source yourself to get a Windows version, although the process looks like a pain in the ass.

Curse whoever floated the idea to lock releases behind paywalls. We should not encourage this behavior.

Do not give them your money.

[–] stevedice@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

give me your work for free

Geez. Just build it yourself, you lazy leech.

[–] pablodaniel@lemmings.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] stevedice@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

As soon as you stop being a useless idiot.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

we also have to pay for a Apple developer account for signed macOS releases

Sounds like you should blame Apple, not the dev.

[–] pablodaniel@lemmings.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Great point.

Now, are they using this as an excuse to not provide a Windows version?

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not specifically. It sounds like they're not really interested in maintaining a Windows version, so for that they charge. Generally I think people should be compensated for their labor, even though that might be an unpopular opinion in this community.

[–] pablodaniel@lemmings.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

So, why even mention apple if you're going to justify the developer's actions anyways?

I'm going to go back to blaming the devs now. Nice try defending the people taking money from you. They're banking on your low standards.

[–] Draconic_NEO@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 1 year ago

They’re banking on your low standards.

Yeah this is unfortunately common, and many people are quick to defend developers like that making excuses.

[–] Chewy7324@discuss.tchncs.de -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Really scummy on their part.

Anyone is free to build it themselves. Someone could even distribute their own build from the same source under a different name completely legally.

They bank on users being lazy and then pay for the convenience.

[–] Draconic_NEO@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 1 year ago

Anyone is free to build it themselves. Someone could even distribute their own build from the same source under a different name completely legally.

You could just as easily in the spirit of this community do it with the same name and code, same way they do it for cracked games. Don't tell me it's not done because there are security concerns, you have no way to tell if cracked games contain secret malware in them yet people still distribute and download those.

They bank on users being lazy and then pay for the convenience.

And also pirates to not outright rip them off, which seems to be working for some reason...