this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2025
506 points (99.6% liked)

Technology

84929 readers
3547 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Ring founder Jamie Siminoff is back at the helm of the surveillance doorbell company, and with him is the surveillance-first-privacy-last approach that made Ring one of the most maligned tech devices. Not only is the company reintroducing new versions of old features which would allow police to request footage directly from Ring users, it is also introducing a new feature that would allow police to request live-st

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 39 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Or you could choose an option that does neither. Why feed the autocrats at all?

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 15 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (4 children)

eh, you might have a spare day to source a completely uncompromised camera and find someone in a trusted neutral country who runs an unproblematic hosting service and configure a system to do offsite storage in a secure way, but I've got other stuff going on. If you can source me a reasonable alternative I'm happy to use it when it comes time to renew my subscription.

[–] Maestro@fedia.io 13 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Just buy a Reolink Doorbell. Pop in an SD card. Put in on your wifi or LAN and access it with your browser. You're done. It's all local. There's an optional app that does need an external server, but that's optional and there is no subscription.

[–] pika@feddit.nl 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Reolink devices still reach out to a bunch of different servers across the world as soon as you connect them to a network.

Always isolate an IP doorbell or camera on its own access point or virtual network, where it can't see or interact with other devices on your local network, and then block it from WAN access.

[–] OhNoMoreLemmy@lemmy.ml 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Ok, but one of the most important use cases is non-local access.

If I'm at home I can just go to the door.

[–] feannag@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] jjlinux@lemmy.ml 4 points 10 months ago

This is highly unlikely to be able to notify you of someone ringing the door. It's doable, but takes some tinkering which most people are not able to do because of all the reasons mentioned in previous comments.

[–] arcterus@piefed.blahaj.zone 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I don't know anything about this product, but if the data is just on an SD card attached to the doorbell, couldn't someone just steal the SD card? Like, this is why offsite storage for cameras is useful.

[–] Maestro@fedia.io 4 points 10 months ago

Sure. That's why I have my Reolink doorbell hooked up to Frigate NVR running on my home server. And frigate is hooked up to my home assistant. But that's the thorough and secure solution, not the quick and easy solution that the grandparent poster was asking for.

[–] tabular@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

An offsite server is not under your control and accessible by who knows. Surely it is still a privacy concern.

Privacy is like security in that it costs time. Most people don't spend time on even having a conversation like this but if something bothers you then finding a spare day is easier.