this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2025
870 points (98.7% liked)

News

37914 readers
2342 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Afatwa, or religious decree, issued by senior Iranian clerics calling for the assassination of U.S. President Donald Trump has attracted online funding worth tens of millions of dollars, reports say.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tyr0sine@mander.xyz 25 points 11 months ago (3 children)
[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 21 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

I’m not asking whether there have been any previous similar bounties—I’m asking whether any of them were the primary incentive for a successful assassination.

The attempt against Rushdie failed, and the attacker claims to have had religious rather than financial motivations (and doesn’t seem to have planned to escape to collect payment in any case).

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

If they got away with it, we won't have heard about it.

[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That’s why I’m specifically wondering about the public aspect of the bounty—it presupposes that the assassin will be publicly known and able to conduct financial transactions afterward, and that the sponsor will be able to openly make good on their promise.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

One way they could do it:

  • assassin writes down their plan, including time, place, method, and payment address
  • assassin hashes plan, then time-stamps and publishes the hash
  • assassination takes place
  • assassin publishes plantext plan and link to hash, proving beforehand knowledge
  • sponsor pays assassin without even having to know who it is
[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (2 children)

The sponsor would have to be able to publicly demonstrate that the assassin was paid, though—otherwise they could claim to have paid the bounty while keeping the money, and the assassin couldn‘t protest without exposing their identity.

[–] logi@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

But they could publish another hash.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 months ago

Since the payment address has been published, anyone can verify whether or not it's received any payments.

[–] glitchdx@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

i kinda wanna read his book now

[–] axEl7fB5@lemmy.cafe 1 points 11 months ago