this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2025
15 points (100.0% liked)
SpaceX
2807 readers
4 users here now
Rules:
- Posts and discussion must be related to SpaceX.
- Community focus is on the company, not its CEO.
- Currently experimenting with the moderation policy for niche communities. If you think you have been banned in error, please reach out.
Related space communities:
- !spaceflight@sh.itjust.works
- !rocketlab@lemmy.nz
- !curiosityrover@lemmy.world
- !perseverancerover@lemmy.world
- !esa@feddit.nl
- !nasa@lemmy.world
- !astronomy@mander.xyz
- !space@mander.xyz
Memes:
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Until now I've been too lazy to look into what rules/guidelines exist for this community. Am I now right in thinking there aren't any? (If so, I'm not complaining!) Or am I just not finding them (as an inexperienced Lemmy user)?
The thing I was going to look into was any posting guidelines. How significant should something be to warrant its own post? For example, this tweet includes a video with an F9 barge landing perspective that I don't remember seeing before.
FWIW, my own feeling is that I'd like a quarterly "General Discussion Thread" (as with the equivalent Subreddit), to gather up all the minor stuff.
Are posts automatically 'published' or do they go through moderation first? (If this is something I should be able to determine myself, if I knew more about Lemmy, LMK and I'll go & do some reading!)
P.S. My thanks to you and all the team for all your efforts.
Another example of something that, to me, doesn't warrant its own post: Interview with Jim Cantrell
Another = A deal with the Italian space agency
None at the moment, other than removing obvious spam/off-topic posts.
Posts should be visible right away. If you posted something and it seems to be stuck in some sort of purgatory, it may have been flagged as a false positive by one of the sh.itjust.works automod bots. I don't know much about these, so I would recommend contacting an admin in that case.
It's a good idea. In the early days of this community, I tried setting up monthly discussion threads, but they didn't garner much activity. I think the inconsistency with which pinned threads are federated between instances (and platforms) might be a factor here. We could try it again, though, if there is sufficient interest.
Personally, I think the examples you provided would be perfectly worthy of their own posts! :)
No. Every post I've ever made 'to Lemmy' has seemingly been 'published'(?) quickly, but I couldn't rule out that this was happening via fast manual approval.
I was mostly just asking out of interest. Perhaps out of a feeling that if there was moderation then I didn't need to think quite so hard about whether a given post was worthy of submitting.
Thanks, it's good to get a 'steer' on this. But are you including my "F9 barge landing perspective that I don’t remember seeing before" example in that? And if so, is that just because you hadn't seen it before either?
What if it had been something else, that already was widely known about? Maybe just let people down-vote the post? Or merely not up-vote it? Maybe we should only post if we'd guess a 60% probability that 60% of community members haven't already seen the post contents?