And following up on that threat was obviously going to be horrible for the people in Gaza.
But please continue patting yourself on your back...
And following up on that threat was obviously going to be horrible for the people in Gaza.
But please continue patting yourself on your back...
If a system is able to change their output or behavior to account for new information, has it not learned?
Depends on the setup and what you call learning. If you let them, bots can write down things to remember in future prompts, and edit those "memories".
What do you think it's meant for? It's a perfect fit for any database that needs to uniquely identify a person.
The problem is using it as authorization without any other checks.
Good. I remember my parents boycotting South Africa over apartheid. Israel is acting much worse than they were.
What? That is true in small companies too.
Obviously wrong.
As far as I can tell, his involvement is investing in a rare earth mineral company as part of a green energy initiative. I don't see anything connecting him to some "freedom city". That's Peter Thiel: https://www.insidehook.com/internet/peter-thiel-praxis-next-great-city-greenland
Lol. If that was true they would vote very differently.
Moving the goalposts is an informal fallacy in which evidence presented in response to a specific claim is dismissed and some other (often greater) evidence is demanded.
Your original argument was that this conflict was opened by kidnapping the head of a state.
Faced with a counterpoint, you're arguing it's not like a much more serious invasion.
True, but that's not invalidating the fact that it was not opened by a kidnapping.
Trump was not ever going to try to stop it, he supports genocide and war crimes. Remember him telling Israel to "finish the job in Gaza"?