unbanshee

joined 1 year ago
[–] unbanshee@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 days ago

Naked moletaburrasaurus.

[–] unbanshee@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 week ago

To me, it's more regulating the behaviour of people than regulating the developers of intentionally addictive and intentionally poorly-moderated systems.

The big hegemonic tech platforms, as they currently exist, are not just harmful to adolescents, they're harmful to society as a whole.

I also don't enjoy the prospect of how a ban like this might be implemented in terms of age and identity verification, since I expect it's going look like "hand the data brokers even more of your personal data, they pinky-swear they'll only use it to comply with the law".

[–] unbanshee@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 1 week ago (8 children)

We'll try literally anything but regulating big tech.

[–] unbanshee@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago

For sure, they did. Most of the big stuff was started, if not completed, by Conservative administrations.

But Chrétien and Martin continued the process. Air Canada, Petro-Can, and CN Rail were all initiated by Mulroney but completed by Liberal PMs.

My point is, I don't see the LPC as reliable defenders of public services and I think it's dangerous to view them as an ally in that context.

[–] unbanshee@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Then pharmacare. Then dental care. Then all the rest of healthcare that our strangled system has left to the private market. Then the telecoms. Then public transit.

[–] unbanshee@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Since when does the LPC need the Cons to privatize public services?

[–] unbanshee@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Also, the function of a torque wrench isn't to apply a lot of a torque with less effort - that's the function of a torque multiplier.

A torque wrench is intended to apply a specific amount of torque to fasteners. Engineers and mechanics have specific torque values for threaded fasteners based on things like material, thread type, load types, and application, and a torque wrench is what we use to make sure that we hit those targets.

[–] unbanshee@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

And the poor too!

Wait, what was that about empathy-less people?

[–] unbanshee@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 months ago

There are many, but the only way most of us ever see them is when we're employed as "the help".

[–] unbanshee@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 4 months ago

Money can't buy this kind of real-life environmental storytelling.

[–] unbanshee@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 6 months ago

Definitely Canadian, I thought it might be NZD, but the shape of the clear window on the $20 matches ours.

 

Private clinics in Canada are selling access to personal health data without patients’ knowledge, according to a new study that says clients in the pharmaceutical industry are paying millions for this information.

“This is not how patients want their data to be used,” lead author Dr. Sheryl Spithoff told CTV’s Your Morning on Monday. “Patients are generally fine with sharing their data if it’s going to be used for research and health system improvement... but they’re very reluctant to have their data shared or held with for-profit companies.”

Spithoff is a family physician and scientist at Women’s College Hospital in Toronto, and an assistant professor at the University of Toronto. Published in the journal JAMA Network Open early this month, the new study focused on two unnamed health data companies that each had access to between one and two million patient records.

“The entities involved in the primary care medical record industry in Canada—chains of for-profit primary care clinics, physicians, commercial data brokers, and pharmaceutical companies—work together to convert patient medical records into commercial assets,” the study explains. “These assets are largely used to further the interests of the pharmaceutical companies.”

Spithoff’s research uncovered two models for how patient data is sold. In one, private clinics sell health information to a third-party commercial data broker that removes personal information before running analytics for the pharmaceutical industry. In another, private clinics are actually owned by a health data company that uses patient information to develop algorithms for pharmaceutical companies in order to identify and target patients with drug interventions.

In both cases, data is typically used without patients’ knowledge or consent.

“According to a data broker employee, no one sought consent from patients to access and use their records,” the study claims. “Instead, companies appeared to seek out physician consent to access patient records.”

Such practices, the study adds, “could potentially generate hundreds of millions of dollars in revenue.”

Spithoff says the study identified a number of risks with the monetization and sharing of patient data.

“One is that this is likely to give the pharmaceutical industry increased control over medical practices, so we’re likely to see more of a focus on expensive new on-patent drug,” Spithoff said. “We’re also very concerned about how the data are being used—anytime data are been shared, there’s privacy risks to patients.”

A physician interviewed for the study told researchers that patient data is “snatched away.”

“It’s patient’s data but how is it that these companies even can own the data?” the physician said, according to the study. “I don’t see how it should even be legal to provide this information."

view more: next ›