Plus ritualistically induced psychosis, banger combo must say
tutter
joined 1 month ago
Those two things are not the same at all, what a nonsense comparison. By that logic any good idea originating from the faroese islands is void. What is all ideas from america automatically voided by all the horrors going on there?
"Don't emulate this idea... Why? Well because the people doing it also has non related bad ideas 😎"
Horsegiirl is a fucking Legend, pure choons
Help i don't get it, i have read the oddyssey btw i just don't get the other tropes
He should've just reposted his first tweet once a year. Reposting your own tweets just cause theyre banger is a king move
Lol why did they explain 'bringing me down' to mean 'taking off a high', to then later explain 'taking off a high' as 'sobering up' 😂
Infinite money glitch, only requirements: human sacrifice
Hell yeah
Not it's just a symbolic framing calm down rationality-crusader
"Be a man, put on that thong. What, a big strong man like you afraid of frilly fabrics? It's just cotton man, it can't hurt you. Aww big man afraid of a piece of fabric so sad :'("
It's fun, you should do it, I've had many interesting interactions when going that route. Most laugh, a few get visibly confused and upset, and bro that's the greatest part. Its a great litmus test of how comfortable a dude is in their masculinity.
Cost of living adjusted for average income and inflation is probably not the same as the 1920s tho. Dont have the numbers on me atm so could be wrong 🤷
The culture of drinking goes way further back than any other probably. Jesus drank wine. Meth is relatively new. So i think it's the combo of being easily manufactured, and the tradition and cultural relevance of the substance as well.
It'd be like trying to ban wheat-farming or something
view more: next ›
It's interesting you say you dont get why people are so obsessed with other people's genitals, when you seemingly care very much about the supposed unethicalness of other adults consentual sex lives. You've somehow managed to flip the very same ideological structure that has allowed poly people to be prosecuted historically, and just pointed that oppressive structure at monogamous folks instead. It's in essence the very same mechanism just with the details flipped.
I think you should reflect upon that. It's obvious from your comments that there's the same sort of mechanism at play as when traditionalists prejudice poly people. It's a failure to empathize. Some things work best for some people, and that's okay, let them live in their way, and some other things work best for some other people, and that's okay too, also let them live in their way.