tofuwabohu

joined 3 years ago
[–] tofuwabohu@slrpnk.net 4 points 5 months ago

Kenne die Firma nicht, bin aber aus dem Grund von Ostrom weg gewechselt. Nur KI Support, irreführende Infonachrichten, nach einer Preisanpassung haben sie unseren jährlichen Abschlag zurückgesetzt den wir gerade hatten anpassen lassen und man musste immer rätseln, was einem die Mails sagen sollen.

[–] tofuwabohu@slrpnk.net 11 points 5 months ago

Everything else didn't make sense when I looked closely. Anarchist commentary and critique always seemed the most plausible in various topics.

[–] tofuwabohu@slrpnk.net 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I mean every other week. I wasn't aware of the other interpretation, but I think in combination with "The Sunday thread" it's unambiguous?

I have never heard fortnightly, but then I'm not a native speaker. Is that commonly used?

 

Almost forgot before going to bed but I feel bi-weekly is a good rhythm for this.

Let us know what you set up lately, what kind of problems you currently think about or are running into, what new device you added to your homelab or what interesting service or article you found.

[–] tofuwabohu@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 years ago

In der Regel hängt es von der Branche ab. Die Gewerkschaften des DGB haben die Branchen "aufgeteilt", IG Metall vertritt idR Industrie, Ver.di Dienstleistungen, IG Bau was der Name sagt etc. DGB ist so ein bisschen der "Standard" und wenn du nach einer großen Gewerkschaft suchst, bist du bei deren Kontaktformular richtig, die vermitteln dich an die passende.

Die hier schon genannte FAU ist dagegen branchenübergreifend und für alle offen, da wird man beim lokalen Syndikat Mitglied. Es gibt in der FAU aber auch Vernetzung zu bestimmten Branchen. Sie haben einen anderen Ansatz und setzen eher auf bottom up, Selbstorganisation und Perspektive über ein bisschen bessere Bedingungen hinaus.

[–] tofuwabohu@slrpnk.net 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Interesting, I wasn't aware Talk has Text, always thought it's video only.

[–] tofuwabohu@slrpnk.net 0 points 2 years ago (4 children)

What exactly is it supposed to bridge?

 

It's Sunday somewhere already so why wait?

Let us know what you set up lately, what kind of problems you currently think about or are running into, what new device you added to your homelab or what interesting service or article you found.

I'll post my ongoing things later/tomorrow but I didn't want to forget the post again.

 

I'm currently planning to build a low power nas for my upcoming minirack (10").

It's going to store daily proxmox vm disk snapshots, some image files and some backups from my laptop, all via NFS. Plus some more in the future, but generally, it's going to idle 95% of the day. Not decided on the OS yet, probably TrueNAS Core or OMV.

I already have an Olmaster 5,25" JBOD in which I'll put 3 x 2,5" 2TB SSD via SATA. The JBOD needs a single Molex connector for powering all SSDs. So I need at least 3 SATA + Boot.

Some recherche led me to this post and I tend towards a similar build with a J4105-ITX (cheaper, probably little less power consumption, enough CPU ofr NAS).

These officially are limited to 8GB RAM but seem to work fine with more if you don't update your BIOS which is not optimal but acceptable if everything else works fine. I'd like 16G for efficient ZFS but I guess even 8 are fine if it's not doing much else (2GB base + almost 1 for each TB storage + OS), just don't tell TrueNAS forum users.

While I don't plan 10G ethernet now, the PCIe slot should leave that possibility open.

I read good things about PicoPSUs, but that depends on which case I get as they usually already got some PSU.

The case question remains open - I tend to get something like the LC-1350MI-V2 as it's cheap, contains a 72W PSU and fits into the 10" rack nicely. In that case, I would need to go out of the case with the SATA cables and rack the JBOD on it's own - which is fine since there's pritable files for exactly that. Other possibility would be to get a case with bays for the 2,5" (seems unnecessary since I already have the JBOD and don't want to add more requirements to the PSU) or get a case with a 5,25" bay (rare in cases this size).

I'm mostly asking for advice regarding the case/PSU thing but nothing is set in stone other than the SSD/JBOD combo. I'd like to keep the rest < 150€ and prefer used hardware, at least for the case. I'd be glad for your thoughts and ideas!

2
Ghost blog adding activitypub (activitypub.ghost.org)
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by tofuwabohu@slrpnk.net to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world
 

Not sure if this has already been posted since it's kind of old news (early 2024), but I think that's exciting. I'm currently looking into blog software with nice webgui and I might wait for this to become real. Looking at the announcement page, they seem to take it seriously and there's continuous merged PRs since April until recently regarding AP on their GitHub.

[–] tofuwabohu@slrpnk.net 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Thanks for keeping us up to date and for caring for the instance!

I'm always torn when it comes to recommending VPN privacy wise. I don't know if handing all my traffic to a company rather than my ISP is really that much of a benefit. Personally I'm not using them.

 

I want to establish a second LAN at home. It's supposed to host different services on different infrastructure (vms, k8s, docker) and mostly serving as a lab.

I want to separate this from the default ISP router LAN (192.68.x.0/24).

I have a machine with 2 NIC (eno1 plugged in at ISP router and eno2), both with corresponding bridges and proxmox. I already set up the eno2 bridge with a 10.x.x.x IP and installed a opnsense vm that has eno1 as the WAN interface in the 192 network and eno2 as the LAN interface as 10. network with dhcp server.

I connected a laptop (no wifi) to eno2, got a dhcp lease and can connect the opnsense interface, machines in the 192 network and the internet, same for a vm on the eno2 bridge, so that part is working. There's a pihole in the 192 network that I successfuly set as the dns server in opnsense.

Here's what I am trying to achieve and where I'm not sure about how to properly do it:

  • Block access from the 10 network to 192 network except for specific devices - I guess that's simply firewall rules
  • Make services (by port) in the 10 network accessible to the internet. I currently have a reverse proxy vm in the 192 network which got 80 and 443 forwarded by the ISP router. Do I need to add a second nic to the vm or can I route some services through the firewall? I want to firewall that vm down so it can't open outgoing connections except for specific ports on specific hosts.
  • Make devices in the 10 network available for devices in the 192 network - here I'm not quite sure. Do I need to a static route?
  • Eventually I want to move all non-enduser devices to the new LAN so I can experiment without harming the family network but I want to make sure I understand it properly before doing that

I'd be glad for any hints on this, I'm a bit confused with the nomenclature here. If you have other ideas on how to approach this, I'm open for that too.