thinkercharmercoderfarmer

joined 6 months ago

Ooh yeah. I was imagining a modified chess engine controlling the red team but I like the dice. Simpler and possible to play with a regular set + red checkers for the queens (and dice ofc). maybe for each deadlock, roll a die and on a nat 1 both convert? That way there's always a risk to leaving them alone. maybe the threshold starts at 1 and increases each turn they remain deadlocked.

For movement, each player rolls a die and moves the Nth queen, counting either up from a1 or down from h8, depending on which player is rolling. If the roll is higher than the number of queens, the farthest one moves. a d8 determines direction.

You could even do everything with just d6s, if that's all you have. 1-4 is cardinal directions, 5 is diagonally toward the center, 6 is diagonally away from the center. Or something like that.

[–] thinkercharmercoderfarmer@slrpnk.net 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Red Scare chess: if two pawns remain deadlocked for four consecutive turns, both pawns are promoted to red queens which are controlled by neither player. After each player's turn, one red queen moves. Red queens can:

  • capture kings
  • capture non-pawns
  • convert an adjacent pawn to red queens

If a king is captured by a red piece, all their remaining pieces become red queens. the other player must eliminate all red pieces to win the game. It is possible for both players to lose.

[–] thinkercharmercoderfarmer@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Your op sounds... much bigger than mine lol. My place is less than a tenth of that. I could see running a battery car out to the equipment, then running that back to the barn to charge / swap batteries. I would love to build one but I don't think it's worth it at my scale.

My rough plan right now is to throw a big old motor in an old tractor chassis, and have a bunch of lead acid batteries on a pallet that sits on top of the engine compartment, and put a solar panel roof over all of it to charge in the field + keep the batteries (and me) out of direct sun. I should be able to drive into the barn, fork the battery onto a rack with a charge cable, fork a new pallet onto the tractor, plug everything in, and get back at it in about 15 minutes, but that's 15 minutes from the time I drive into the barn to the time I leave the barn, it doesn't account for transit time to and from the barn, but that's only a few more minutes on a small farm.

I mean, diesel's expensive too. Batteries already look tempting and I think they're only going to look better as time goes on. The only real hurdle for me is the initial outlay for the new hardware.

[–] thinkercharmercoderfarmer@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I think there would have to be battery swaps. at large enough scales, it might even make sense to have a separate smaller vehicle just for running batteries out to the large machines, though fields swaps would be tough to keep clean.

For smaller jobs though, I could see running the tractor for a few hours, heading back to the barn to swap out the battery pack(s), then heading back out after maybe 15 minutes of downtime. At the rate that batteries would need to be swapped out, I think it would make sense to have batteries on a forklift pallet that can be forked off the tractor and onto a charging cradle, then fork a fresh battery pack onto the tractor and head back out. or, there could be a specialized battery swapping deck that the vehicle drives over, which would be cool because the same batteries and swapping gear could be used for cars and trucks.

With autonomous tractors, they could theoretically detect when they need a swap and orchestrate the swap automatically, making them capable of running nearly continuously, 24 hours a day. It would be very complicated and I don't doubt that early implementations would have their share of headaches, but that looks like where we're heading from my perspective.

Nice! I'm a little behind you, I think, but I'm determined to get there. The plan is to get my house, my farm, and the vehicles I use to 100% self-produced energy. It's going slowly but it's going.

[–] thinkercharmercoderfarmer@slrpnk.net 0 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

One day I'm going to buy the last gallon of diesel I ever buy. I'd like it to happen a long time before I die.

[–] thinkercharmercoderfarmer@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Stealing this, thanks.

Do you know what it's from? I can't place it at all.

[–] thinkercharmercoderfarmer@slrpnk.net 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

and government handouts. If the government will bail you out no matter how badly you fuck up, it's pretty easy to ignore shitty policies.

Here's a thought: if your business model relies on exploiting immigrants, fuck you.

[–] thinkercharmercoderfarmer@slrpnk.net 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Reading through the opinion, I wouldn't be surprised to see this ruling come up in defense of chatbots trained on copyrighted works.

A provider induces infringement if it actively encourages
infringement through specific acts. Grokster, 545 U. S., at
942 (Ginsburg, J., concurring). For example, in Grokster,
we held that a jury could find two file-sharing software com-
panies liable for inducement. Id., at 941 (majority opinion).
The companies promoted and marketed their software as a
tool to infringe copyrights. Id., at 926. The “principal ob-
ject” of their business models “was use of their software to
download copyrighted works.”

"Sure, it can rip off copyrighted works, but your honor, we pinky promise that was never our principal object". I could see it flying. Interestingly enough, the US Solicitor General explicitly brought up DMCA safe harbor in its amicus brief (siding with Cox):

The Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA),
Pub. L. No. 105-304, 112 Stat. 2860 (17 U.S.C. 512), gave
service providers, including ISPs, a safe-harbor defense
to claims of copyright infringement. That defense
shields ISPs from liability for copyright infringement
based on, among other things, “the provider’s transmit-
ting, routing, or providing connections for, material
through a system or network controlled or operated by
or for the service provider.” 17 U.S.C. 512(a). To qual-
ify for that safe harbor, the service provider must
“adopt[] and reasonably implement[] * * * a policy that
provides for the termination in appropriate circum-
stances of subscribers * * * who are repeat infringers.”

I'd expect this admin to brief the court in a way that favors Musk et al, and it kind of makes sense that you'd want to bolster safe harbor protections, but I imagine a safe harbor defense of LLMs would require the reasonable policy of not training your LLM on a bunch of copyrighted works without their permission, with the express intent of creating derivative works on demand for your paying clients.

Opinion: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-171_bq7d.pdf

US SG amicus brief: https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/24/24-171/359730/20250527172556075_Cox-Sony.CVSG.pdf

The grant application practically writes itself.

 

if I had to replace my tractor today I honestly have no idea which I would pick, but I think all of them come with irreplaceable software components. Are there any tractors available that have fully reviewable / replaceable control software?

 

cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/34029792

If you are in the market for a down-low secret crime pad, BOYLE properties can hook you up.

https://boyle.com/properties/5904-ridgeway-center-parkway/

New (or expanded) Nashville offices per Wired:

Estes Kefauver Federal Building

Nashville House Office Building
 

If you are in the market for a down-low secret crime pad, BOYLE properties can hook you up.

https://boyle.com/properties/5904-ridgeway-center-parkway/

 

I have just found that another one of my LiPo battery packs has started to develop a belly, and I'd like to replace it with one where I can just swap out the cells rather than junking the entire unit. I haven't had much luck finding something that meets my, I think modest, needs.

Needs:

  • USB 5V power (enough to charge one modern cell phone, slowly)
  • replaceable cells (18650s would be ideal but I'd settle for something that took AA or AAA batteries too)

Nice to haves:

  • USB-A and USB-C (though I can manage with either - I have a ton of cables for both)
  • Fast charging (the more watts the better but all I really need is ~10W at most)
  • Passthrough charging (can charge and keep the output hot at the same time)

Sky Pie:

  • Hot swapping cells (can selectively discharge one cell or bank of cells, then switch to the other while the dead cells are being replaced)

For that last one, I think if I can find a pack that just meets the "Needs" requirements I can rig up two of them and a raspberry pi to handle the charge monitoring and source switching. I just would like something that uses commodity hardware like the 18650 to store the power, can deliver enough voltage to run the pi, and is designed to have the cells be user replaceable. Is there something like that on the market?

 

Bathroom sink stayed liquid overnight with just dripping, but the kitchen sink is on an exterior wall and froze solid last night. I got under there with a heat gun and got the water flowing again, fortunately the whole system didn't freeze so nothing burst. I also installed a heating cable with a thermostat on the pipe, got it wrapped up snug under some foam insulation, hopefully that'll keep it liquid as long as I keep some water running through it. gonna monitor tonight and see how it goes.

Sorry for no pics, it is very cold and I went as fast as possible.

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/42112119

https://www.votekristiburke.com/
Her website (she also sells anti-ICE merch!! )
ig

  • Abolish ICE

And replace it with a humane immigration system grounded in due process, human rights, and accountability.

  • Impeach Donald Trump

For ongoing abuses of power, violations of democratic norms, and threats to constitutional governance

  • Healthcare for All
    Healthcare is a right, not a privilege. Guaranteed access for every person in this country.
  • Tax the Rich
  • Publicly Funded Scientific Research for the Public Good
  • Well-Funded, Equal-Access Public Education
  • Stop Funding Genocide
    I will not support U.S. military aid or funding that contributes to the mass killing of civilians in Gaza.
 

cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/32957140

I thought of this after reading the first example in the comm sidebar.

In elementary Microwave Math (the subset most people learn during the normal operation of a consumer microwave), there are two places, the seconds place and the minutes place. The seconds place is constrained to [00 - 99] inclusive for one hundred total possible values in that place. The minutes place can be constrained to the same set of symbols, in which case Microwave Math is simply a base one hundred numeral system operating in a base sixty place value system, leading to the mildly humorous situation of having two ways to represent the same numerical value, e.g. 01:20 = 00:80. Some microwaves may have an hours place, or different constraints on the possible values of the minutes place, for which we'll need...

Advanced Microwave Math! This introduces the concept of nested place value systems. Most of us are so used to place value numbering systems that we hardly notice how often we use them, but most numbering systems follow an implicit rule that the number of symbols is the same as the value of moving up a "place". This makes sense for counting because you don't need to move up a place until you run out of symbols, so you may as well make the value of the next place the next number you need to represent. Numeral systems don't have to follow this rule, and Advanced Microwave Math breaks it.

The simplest case is where the minutes place is bounded to the set of all non-negative integers. In this value system there are two places, each with their own rules governing which symbols are allowed and what values they can represent. the seconds place is constrained in value to 00 - 99 (decimal, or DEC), and has a place value of one. The minutes place might be constrained to [00 - 99DEC], [000 - 999DEC], or it might be that the minutes place can contain any non-negative integer.

After that, we come to the hours place, which functions more or less the same way as the minutes place, in that it can have various constraints on what values can be used, but it still has the same place value relationship to the minutes place of sixty that minutes has to seconds. This changes with the introduction of the days place, which has a value of 24DECxhours instead of 60DEC.

Expanding this system into weeks and months and years introduces the idea that, though the system is generally presented one with positional notation (the value of place n is some [usually fixed] multiple of the value of place n+1). This isn't necessary for Microwave Math, if each place can be defined by an arbitrary multiple of the of a base value e.g. the years place could be defined as 31557600DEC seconds (the "Julian Year"). The only requirement is that instead of position dictating the multiplier, each place must have a unique symbol denoting which multiplier is being used by that place. By convention they are arranged from largest multiplier to least, but 3 years, 6 months, and 12 seconds can just as unambiguously be written as 12 seconds, 3 years, and 6 months and refer to the same amount of microwave time (c.f. the American middle-endian date representation, a similar rule-breaking place value system that, if we insist upon using it, could really benefit from some non-positional place value indicator).

The value multiplier for a place doesn't have to be an integer either. The introduction of leaps (day and second) and other vagaries of calculating means that we might prefer to use a "mean" value where a year might be some non-integer multiple of seconds, depending on which period of earth's history one is in. There's no reason the multiplier has to be an integer, or non-negative, or real, or rational, or continuous or differentiable or have any particular reference to any other place. In addition, each place has its own rules about what values can be in it, and those rules may mean that each place can have infinitely many symbols representing infinitely many values.

The inner place value systems can themselves be a simple positional place value system like decimal, or they can themselves use Microwave Math, meaning that place value systems in Microwave Math can nest infinitely. I'm not sure what kind of number that is but Microwave Math has some crazy implications to it.

 

I thought of this after reading the first example in the comm sidebar.

In elementary Microwave Math (the subset most people learn during the normal operation of a consumer microwave), there are two places, the seconds place and the minutes place. The seconds place is constrained to [00 - 99] inclusive for one hundred total possible values in that place. The minutes place can be constrained to the same set of symbols, in which case Microwave Math is simply a base one hundred numeral system operating in a base sixty place value system, leading to the mildly humorous situation of having two ways to represent the same numerical value, e.g. 01:20 = 00:80. Some microwaves may have an hours place, or different constraints on the possible values of the minutes place, for which we'll need...

Advanced Microwave Math! This introduces the concept of nested place value systems. Most of us are so used to place value numbering systems that we hardly notice how often we use them, but most numbering systems follow an implicit rule that the number of symbols is the same as the value of moving up a "place". This makes sense for counting because you don't need to move up a place until you run out of symbols, so you may as well make the value of the next place the next number you need to represent. Numeral systems don't have to follow this rule, and Advanced Microwave Math breaks it.

The simplest case is where the minutes place is bounded to the set of all non-negative integers. In this value system there are two places, each with their own rules governing which symbols are allowed and what values they can represent. the seconds place is constrained in value to 00 - 99 (decimal, or DEC), and has a place value of one. The minutes place might be constrained to [00 - 99DEC], [000 - 999DEC], or it might be that the minutes place can contain any non-negative integer.

After that, we come to the hours place, which functions more or less the same way as the minutes place, in that it can have various constraints on what values can be used, but it still has the same place value relationship to the minutes place of sixty that minutes has to seconds. This changes with the introduction of the days place, which has a value of 24DECxhours instead of 60DEC.

Expanding this system into weeks and months and years introduces the idea that, though the system is generally presented one with positional notation (the value of place n is some [usually fixed] multiple of the value of place n+1). This isn't necessary for Microwave Math, if each place can be defined by an arbitrary multiple of the of a base value e.g. the years place could be defined as 31557600DEC seconds (the "Julian Year"). The only requirement is that instead of position dictating the multiplier, each place must have a unique symbol denoting which multiplier is being used by that place. By convention they are arranged from largest multiplier to least, but 3 years, 6 months, and 12 seconds can just as unambiguously be written as 12 seconds, 3 years, and 6 months and refer to the same amount of microwave time (c.f. the American middle-endian date representation, a similar rule-breaking place value system that, if we insist upon using it, could really benefit from some non-positional place value indicator).

The value multiplier for a place doesn't have to be an integer either. The introduction of leaps (day and second) and other vagaries of calculating means that we might prefer to use a "mean" value where a year might be some non-integer multiple of seconds, depending on which period of earth's history one is in. There's no reason the multiplier has to be an integer, or non-negative, or real, or rational, or continuous or differentiable or have any particular reference to any other place. In addition, each place has its own rules about what values can be in it, and those rules may mean that each place can have infinitely many symbols representing infinitely many values.

The inner place value systems can themselves be a simple positional place value system like decimal, or they can themselves use Microwave Math, meaning that place value systems in Microwave Math can nest infinitely. I'm not sure what kind of number that is but Microwave Math has some crazy implications to it.

 

I have recently accidentally come into possession of a bunch of old lead acid batteries, ranging from a few months to several years without charging or maintenance. I could just get rid of them, but I would like to recondition and reuse them as additional power storage for my solar array, if possible. I have been looking at desulfator chargers online and I am planning on getting one and hooking it up to the batteries and just seeing what happens.

Does anyone have any experience reconditioning old lead acid batteries? Are there pitfalls I should be aware of? Since they are of unknown condition, am I better off scrapping them and buying new?

1
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by thinkercharmercoderfarmer@slrpnk.net to c/art@slrpnk.net
 
view more: next ›