themachine

joined 2 years ago
[–] themachine@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago (13 children)

Why 2016 specifically?

[–] themachine@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Most likely no unless the raid controllers are identical and you aren't using Synology's hybrid raid stuff.

[–] themachine@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago

Per his description it uses Restic under the hood so for the nitty gritty on that you can just go read the very decent Restic docs.

I'm a big fan of restic and use it for all my backups.

[–] themachine@lemmy.world 5 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

If the router is the single point if entry at your edge then I'd run fail2ban on it assuming it can see the traffic

[–] themachine@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (4 children)

What made you switch to it over tailscale+headscale? Currently that's been doing everything I need without issue.

[–] themachine@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Check out the Teamspeak6 beta. I don't know about offline messages but it addresses all your other complaints. I moved to it from Mumble somewhat recently and have been very happy with it.

[–] themachine@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Machine wise anything will work. Give yourself a chassis with room to add more disks down the road or just build your storage setup in a way that gives you what flexibility you need (though that tends to come with sacrifices).

I use Nextcloud for general file syncing between devices as occaisonal small file sharing.

[–] themachine@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Mulvad is great but if you need port forwarding you'll have to look elsewhere as they no longer provide that feature.

[–] themachine@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

I use keepass2android and "sync" via its native WebDAV support with my nextcloud instance as the source. Been working great forever.

[–] themachine@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Ah, well, then perhaps I will monitor it.

For internal use I just monitor everything with zabbix. What Ive been wanting is (as I said) a public "status screen" that my few users can hit just to verify if things are in fact down or if it's just them.

[–] themachine@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Ok, you might have finally gotten me to consider a "dashboard". I've been wanting a simple public facing service status page and this sounds like a nice solution.

[–] themachine@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Haha, I've never had to deal with something quite that high pressure but I've definitely been a little looser than standard during at least a couple emergencies.

view more: next ›