stankmut

You are right about the current implementation, but the title of the post and what the other person is referring to is the original version. A product manager at Microsoft opened a PR and then an engineer merged it in and that PR caused it to put "co-authored by Copilot" on every commit made through VS Code, regardless of Copilot usage.

A few hours after the outrage started, the developer showed up and said the intention was only for Copilot generated code and that a mistake had been made (the statement you are referring to). Then he fixed it.

We're stuck in the outrage loop where someone who missed the whole thing sees something about the incident and posts it in an outrage and then people read that and get angry and post it in other communities. Everyone is talking about how Microslop wants to steal your code instead of the actual problem of product managers at Microsoft using copilot to implement code changes and then a software engineer merging it and it being released without testing.

The New York Times isn't Murdoch owned. You're probably thinking of the New York Post.

Surely the last 4 digits don't point to an exact house. I'm fairly certain my zip code has more than 9999 houses. It does seem like it would get you pretty close though.

Their license also says they will not let anyone use their logo. So it doesn't appear to be a reasonable attribution.

The game containing public domain images wouldn't make the entire game public domain. Someone with a copy of the game could distribute those particular assets though. Maybe. It depends on how much human effort was involved; an AI image can become copyrightable if enough effort was done to transform it after it was generated.

It depends on what you are using placeholder assets for. If you want to use it to gauge how a scene would look before setting out to build it, then placeholders that stand out get in the way. You would need a way of tracking all the slop, but then you could have a build tool track how much slop is still in the game to make sure you catch it all before release.

It doesn't say when they told Wikipedia about the paid editing, but once Wikipedia investigated it they banned them and denied the appeal. The account never came back to make more edits after they were discovered.

I was actually just reading just reading about this pretty recently. If I remember correctly, the manga has her explicitly possess a human shell when she needs to interact with humans, and she doesn't have those powers in that form. The anime glosses over that, so you just see her fly around a lot in the early episodes and then she stops.

Most toilets I've used don't fill the bowl with enough water on a single flush to overflow. You can adjust the chain (assuming not an office toilet) if it's flushing for too long.

The only times I've overflowed a toilet I was as a kid, not realizing that trying to flush again might make the problem worse.

I assume either they mean they don't keep flushing it over and over if the bowl fills up or their toilet flapper has a short chain and stops flushing quickly when they let go.

Are DDR3 sodimms manufactured by anybody anymore? I don't think Crucial leaving the consumer market will matter here.

Edit: I looked into this more and it turns out that DDR3 was being produced until very recently. I expected it to have died out completely when DDR5 hit the scene. I can't quite tell if the production has completely stopped (all of the articles are talking about it happening at the end of this year), but it seems likely. I wouldn't expect any brand to be offering new DDR3 sticks in a few years.

These are vinyl. They just tear at the top where the hook goes.

It was a race between my cat chewing the cords holding my horizontal blinds together vs the vertical blinds just deciding to self destruct. I've had wet toilet paper that tore less easily then the vertical blinds I have.