spartanatreyu

Hosting LLMs is different from pushing AI crap down end users’ throats Copilot style.

That feels a lot like "War profiteers aren't guilty of shooting the gun".

You misunderstood the first sentence in my comment.

I've edited the word had to needed to make it more clear.

All the CEO needed to say after funding that fascist was:

Oops, sorry. I didn't check out that developer's history before funding his project. It won't happen again. I promise going forwards that we'll google people's names first before sending them any money.

They didn't have to make a big deal about it, even a simple quickly forgotten post on their personal social media account would have been enough.

People still ask him about it, and he'll talk about anything else.

But he won't give a simple apology.

His silence is deafening.

Better to just go for the EU version of framework without the fascism: https://novacustom.com/

Edit: Changed "All the CEO had to say" to "All the CEO needed to say" to avoid confusion.

Only something created by a human can be copyrightable. (See the copyright status of monkey who took a selfie for precedent).

Any code written by an LLM is not copywritable because a human did not write it.

Also the company that trained the LLM is likely in breach of the licenses the code palls under.

If the rewrite is based on something which has a license that your company can't use, then the rewrite likely can't be used either

write something that already exists so it doesn’t need to think

If something already exists, it shouldn't need to be rewritten.

Doing otherwise is a sign that something has gone wrong.

That was the case before LLMs and it is still the case today.

You replied to someone establishing a premise (ebikes are not dangerous), then built a whole wall of text built upon that premise. If the premise is removed, everything else built upon it falls down.

The premise was flawed.

I pointed that out.

Anything built upon it becomes irrelevant. There's as much point to go through the text built upon the flawed premise, as there is to keep trying to build upon it.

The physics is not, per se, relevant.

I will forever remember this day, the 8th of April 2026 when Zagorath discovered that when it came to traffic collisions: physics was not relevant.

Please remember me, the little person, in your acceptance speech to the Nobel Committee.

because ebikes are not capable of tearing around. They are pedal assist only, no throttle; limited to going 25 km/h while receiving motor assistance [...] All ebikes do is making riding easier at the same or lower speeds than regular cyclists are doing

• Alert: Viral Ragebait

  • Type: Faulty Argument

    • Subtype: Lie of omission

• Alert: Faulty Reasoning

  • Type: Fallacy

    • Subtype: False Equivalence

A bike going 10km faster than an ebike is not more dangerous than the ebike.

The reverse is also true: An ebike going 10km slower than a bike does not make the ebike safer.

Reason: The ebike has more mass, which means there's a lot more inertia getting transferred during a collision.

The first month is inputted with a 1 and exported as a 0.

The first day is inputted with a 1 and exported as a 1.

WTF is with some of the tests using a 6144 x 2560 resolution?

What the hell kind of display are they using?

The only one I could find at that weird-ass resolution was a 52 inch?! dell monitor.

Is anyone seriously using a 52 inch display?

I think they should probably be using normal resolutions for all the tests so they don't end up benchmarking some weird corner case optimisation issue that no one is going to run into.

Respectfully disagree.

Gnome is the environment not implementing Server-side window decorations.

That makes everything harder for app developers since they have to implement client side window decorations to make apps movable just for Gnome.

When apps can't be moved around on Gnome because they don't have a window handle to drag, it doesn't really fit the "it just works" requirement.