prototype_g2

joined 2 years ago
 

Source: https://www.deviantart.com/scruffyeevee/art/SSED-Music-Eevees-1304714966

More:

Jo

Wyatt

Author's Comment:

Here are some eevees who love music in SSED!!! :D

Wyatt is a music teacher, and Zoey+Jo are his apprentices!


Zoey- https://toyhou.se/10313841.zoey

Jo- https://toyhou.se/10307555.jo

Wyatt- https://toyhou.se/34903864.wyatt

 

Source: https://www.deviantart.com/scruffyeevee/art/SSED-What-can-I-say-1303247965

More:

Author's Comment:

Free to use to tell your local bestie how much of a simp they are, OR! To proclaim your love and devotion to your local fictional character/V-tuber/waifu/husbando

 

Source: https://www.deviantart.com/scruffyeevee/art/SSED-Lighting-Practice-1237497872

Author's Comment:

Just some lighting practice from a year ago

 

Source: https://www.deviantart.com/scruffyeevee/art/SSED-The-Leafeons-1294199341

Author's Comment:

Here we have Daisy in her natural environment- causing mass chaos.

All Leafeon who are going to be in SSED are here!!! Yes! ALL OF THEM! :)

Also for those who don't stay updated with the Toyhouse, I evolved Bow! She's the leafeon screaming for her life! <3 (She's terrified of Bugs... because of Daisy.)

Sorry for the file quality! It seems to have gotten a bit corrupted...


https://toyhou.se/9493748.daisy

https://toyhou.se/10302025.bow

https://toyhou.se/29152831.basil

https://toyhou.se/28294706.grim

 

Source: https://www.deviantart.com/scruffyeevee/art/SSED-Everymon-1292019502

More:

Author's Comment:

Who do you agree with?

 

Source: https://www.deviantart.com/scruffyeevee/art/SSED-Eve-Denny-1290873695#image-1

More:

Author's Comment:

I have nothing to say, just that I've been working in the background and have been making major strides in SSED's plot, specifically the major mysteries around it (So we are replacing the lab mystery with something else.) Ofc, SSED is no where close to releasing, this is just a small update! Here is Eve and Denny!


If you want more SSED updates, follow me on Toyhouse! I put a lot of stuff there (Character bios too) https://toyhou.se/Scruffyeevee

 

Source: https://www.deviantart.com/scruffyeevee/art/DTAT-Day-5-Electric-1283829430

Author's Comment:

DAY 5 AND LOOK AT MY BOIIIIIIIIII!!! CHARGED CREEPER JOLTEON????? BASED BASED BASED!!! PERFECT COMBO!

https://toyhou.se/15392278.retu

 

Source: https://www.deviantart.com/scruffyeevee/art/DTAT-Day-4-Fire-1283393680

Author's Comment:

Day 4!! Going into the nether to fight some Wither skeletons! Decked out in netherite and gold ofc!

https://toyhou.se/15392278.retu

 

Source: https://www.deviantart.com/scruffyeevee/art/DTAT-Day-3-Water-1282913267

Author's Comment:

Day 3 and Retu's a shiny vaporeon here! A Deep Ocean diver and drowned hunter!

With his Zombie Nautilus pet, he travels the oceans hunting all the underwater baddies! Zombie nautilus jockeys beware!!!

https://toyhou.se/15392278.retu

 

Source: https://www.deviantart.com/scruffyeevee/art/DTAT-Day-2-Grass-1282548523

Author's Comment:

Time for day two of the challenge!!! Here we have Retu as a (shiny) leafeon farmer guy!!!

Bro is rocking that Netherite hoe!! (... Why would anyone make a netherite hoe...?)

YOU SEE!!! THE Retu lore is Retu is a LOSER normal eevee irl, but in MINECRAFT, he's super cool and shiny and awesome and epic and can do whatever he wants! >:3

https://toyhou.se/15392278.retu

 

Source: https://www.deviantart.com/scruffyeevee/art/DTAT-Day-1-Normal-1281994278

Author's Comment:

Hey guys!!! I'm going to try and do @Yukiveei art challenge!! If anyone wants to join me, that'll be super fun!!! >w>

Also!! this character is Retu!!! Going to be designing a BUNCH of designs for him!! >:3

Edit: since people are commenting

THIS CHARACTER HAS NO AFFILIATION TO DREAM!!!

(While Yes he was made as a Dream Parody/meme, I just really like this character specifically, and I like his design. I'm not a fan of Dream at all, nor have I ever watched his content lol.)

https://toyhou.se/15392278.retu

 

Source: https://www.deviantart.com/scruffyeevee/art/AT-Umbreon-hugs-1273011329

Author's Comment:

Another art trade!!! For @Yukiveei

The Brees <3 <3 They are very cute UwU

...

Again, my art trades are closed sweats (I have so much work to do, sob)

[–] prototype_g2@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Reminds me of Barotrauma

[–] prototype_g2@lemmy.ml 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The classic Ad Hominem. Instead of actually refuting the arguments, you instead attack the ones making them.

So, tell me, which part of "As Bainbridge [7] noted, a key irony of automation is that by mechanising routine tasks and leaving exception-handling to the human user, you deprive the user of the routine opportunities to practice their judgement and strengthen their cognitive musculature, leaving them atrophied and unprepared when the exceptions do arise.” is affected by the conflict of interests with the company? This is a note made by Bainbridge. The argument is as follows

If you use the machine to think for you, you will stop thinking.

Not thinking leads to a degradation of thinking skills

Therefore, using machine to think for you will lead to a degradation of thinking skills.

It is not too hard to see that if you stop doing something for a while, your skill to do that thing will degrade overtime. Part of getting better is learning from your own mistakes. The AI will rob you those learning experiences.

What is the problem with the second quote? It is not an opinion, it is an observation.

Other's have noticed this already:

https://www.darrenhorrocks.co.uk/why-copilot-making-programmers-worse-at-programming/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8DdEoJVZpqA

https://nmn.gl/blog/ai-illiterate-programmers

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cQNyYx2fZXw


This, of course, only happens if you use the AI to think for you.

[–] prototype_g2@lemmy.ml 0 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Microsoft did a study on this and they found that those who made heavy usage of AI tools said they felt dumber:

"Such consternation is not unfounded. Used improperly, technologies can and do result in the deterioration of cognitive faculties that ought to be preserved. As Bainbridge [7] noted, a key irony of automation is that by mechanising routine tasks and leaving exception-handling to the human user, you deprive the user of the routine opportunities to practice their judgement and strengthen their cognitive musculature, leaving them atrophied and unprepared when the exceptions do arise."

Cognitive ability is like a muscle. If it is not used regularly, it will decay.

It also said it made people less creative:

"users with access to GenAI tools produce a less diverse set of outcomes for the same task, compared to those without. This tendency for convergence reflects a lack of personal, contextualised, critical and reflective judgement of AI output and thus can be interpreted as a deterioration of critical thinking."

LINK

[–] prototype_g2@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That’s not how AI works

How does it work then? I see lot's pf people claiming to know how it works... only to not actually know how the training works exactly, only a superficial understanding.

How is access limited and at the same time you are bullying everyday Joes who are actually using it?

Ah yes, because people in 3rd world countries earning $1 an hour or less to label that data for the image gen can 100% afford the $10/month for a subscription or a pc to run locally.

Delete all software and turn off your computer or be a hypocrite.

How so?

The stuff they use for training is free for any artist to train on.

The fact that you think AI training and humans looking at thinks are the same thing tells me you don't know how humans art nor how machines train.

You don’t own the definition of art and nobody you will encounter in a post of any sort is even doing it for major profit.

  1. True. However, this argument should not be about semantics;
  2. I got news for ya.

You don’t own the definition of art.

This is not about definitions, I won't spend time arguing semantics with you. Also, why re-state yourself?

AI is for everyone, but is made for the rich to get richer, like literally everything else you see or do online

Without social development, all forms of technological development will do nothing but allow for greater forms of torment.

[–] prototype_g2@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Some Lemmy clients offer the option to auto-hide posts and comments which contain certain keywords of the choice of the user. Are there any plans to implement this feature into the stock Lemmy experience?

I know it is possible to do some hacky stuff with UblockOrigin to do the same, but that is not something most know about and are willing to do.

[–] prototype_g2@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago

Have you ever heard of a password manager?

[–] prototype_g2@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (10 children)

hmm... And why would you say supporting Russia and Palestine count has "understanding geopolitics"? I say this as someone who does not know too much about it.

[–] prototype_g2@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago

I've been quietly observing hexbear for a while now and I can tell you with relative certainty that people love to straw man them.

Here is an example:

People say they outright deny the Tiananmen Square Massacre, which is not true. They do believe 300 or so people died in that tragic day. What they do deny, though, is that Tank Man himself was run over by a tank and that people where indiscriminately shot and run over by tanks in the square. They believe the shootout occurred not because China is evil, but because some of the protestors decided it was a good idea to start killing unarmed soldiers.

I'm not going to describe in detail hexbear's timeline of events and evidence for it, because I myself do not fully understand it yet. But it seems this video somewhat explains it well.

People insist time and time again that hexbear users believe the massacre never happened to the point where they can't bother explaining themselves anymore because "what's the point if we are just going to get straw manned?"

People also like to call the massacre a "genocide", which is a massive overstatement. In comparison with the kill count of the holocaust, the death toll of the massacre is a rounding error. I would like to kindly ask people to stop calling it a genocide, as it detracts from the meaning and intensity of the word "genocide" when it is miss used like that. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double_genocide_theory


Any who, can't wait for people telling how wrong I am for supporting hexbear despite never once saying they were right.

People say they brigade other instances, but that's just because they are very active. In fact, there are one of the most active instances on Lemmy.


This is not to say hexbear users are angels, far from it. They are known to not mix well with other communities, and their site culture can put people off quite a bit, and understandably so. They all also known for their custom emojis, which is a really neat feature their instance has, but they do like to use an emoji depicting a pig defecating as a way of saying "you take is shit", which is rather unpleasant and quite rude of them.


These are just my thoughts on hexbear anyways. I must say I don't really hyper analyze any instance, so I could be somewhat wrong, but I don't really care too much.


NOTE: right now hexbear is using chapo.chat as their temporary fall back domain.

[–] prototype_g2@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

For those who downvoted without reading the link... This whole thing is satire.

The aim of this satirical campaign is to use humour to connect your personal needs for Earth’s resources with the evidence of just how much of these resources are now being claimed for the data centres running generative AI. And to make you smile.

https://savethe.ai/about/

[–] prototype_g2@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We should probably still allow links to archives/alternative front ends because screenshots of content can be forged. But yeah we should not give those sites more traffic and only link to archives/alternative front ends if necessary.

view more: next ›