[...] Is that “nonbinary” is not the most accurate term for people because it, seems to me, to imply that gender is binary.
It does not imply that. If it did, it would defeat itself, because there is no place for nonbinary in binary. It implies that a slice of gender can be seen as binary (Men and Women), but there is more to it.
But the post talks about "fair" vs. "unfair" not "good" vs "bad". And if you want to say an Action is fair for us but unfair for them, you would need additional rules to distinguish between the Actions in respect to the Actors. Otherwise, it would indeed be hypocrisy. (Not that it matters too much, this is not sports.)
What makes you think, she is complaining?
Yes, I misremembered/misread the original text. Thank you for noticing me.
The application (or browser functionality) showing you the PDF should offer a button for that. However, the website might customize or replace that application to prevent it to give you a download button.
But, those functionalities (PDF viewing) are mostly in the client, so you need the PDF file locally anyway, so you might find it in the Network tab in the web developer tools (F12).
The dark almond sea salt from Tony's is. Ritter Sport and Lindt also have some vegan products, Haribo probably too.
The comic doesn't talk about 'all men' or even 'men' at all. There are all sorts of people acting like this and if you don't, you don't have to defend yourself or attack your imagined adversary.
The race-horse-girl game is not realistic about animal cruelty in real horse racing.
You think this is an attack on the race-horse-girl game?
It is a variable holding the process id of the shell instance interpreting the command. You could say "yourself" instead.
I can see how people could have problems with that, yes. It is just not what I understood from the comment.