So, you can just distribute your wealth to your offspring shortly before your death.
And they would pay income tax on it, just as they do if you were to give your wealth to them before you die today. That is fine. Having property rights when you are alive is fine. Having rights to a dead person's property with tax avoidance is not.
When you're dead, you are incapable of making choices. Giving rights to dead people is an awful idea, and we should stop pretending it makes sense.
Good. Generational wealth is bad for society.
It is about California. The comment you replied to was about California. My comments replying to you have been about California. That original comment you replied to and my own comments have said that California's law is reasonable. You keep saying it isn't, but you have yet to present any reason why.
Once again, that post is about age verification, so it doesn't apply to the California law. If there are no documents or pictures stored for age verification, there is nothing to breach.
He said exactly the same thing I said: laws like the California one that don't require age verification are fine.
what is the point of the OS asking
Because for the purpose of securing kids accounts, it doesn't make sense for the kids to enter their ages themselves each time they create an account at a new website.
Tell me how it can be used against me. It doesn't give out any information beyond what I let it give out about me, and that information (an age range) is derived from information I get to make up. Remember, the California law doesn't require any verification of the age data that is given to the OS.
Companies are already required to ask if their users are kids because, among other reasons, there are laws against creating ad profiles for kids, and companies have been sued for doing this even accidentally. The California law just changes how they're required to check if they're a kid from asking them at account creation to asking the OS at account creation, where the parents have set the age for them when the OS account was created. It gives the company checking if they're a kid no more information than they had before. I agree with Havoc8154@mander.xyz that this is totally reasonable.
This particular federal bill, on the other hand seems closer to the Florida bill in that it requires some form of age verification instead of just accepting what the parents enter when creating the OS account. That is unreasonable. Complain to your representative, and we'll see how it gets amended.
La Ville Derrière
He is the same as Sotomayor and Jackson according to many Lemmings.
In the U.S., the gifter has to pay federal gift tax. If you transfer a million dollar property, it will be taxed at 40%. Federal inheritance tax has an exemption up to $14 million.