nikolasdimi

joined 6 months ago
 

Upfront: I'm a co-founder of ApyHub. I am looking to grow the number of APIs and endpoints on the platform. That's my primary interest here, read everything with that in mind.

Some of the best APIs I have seen are built by one person solving one problem extremely well. This can be anything, a holiday data service. A screenshot renderer. A receipt or a cv parser. Technically solid, running for years, and almost nobody knows they exist. The builder is busy maintaining it. Distribution is a different job they never signed up for.

That's the job we took on. We cover the entire layer from API discovery to consumption. Here's what that means for a provider:

  • Distribution. One subscription gives our users the whole catalog, so your API is available to every subscriber the moment it goes live. No marketing site, no SEO grind.

  • MCP by default. Every endpoint is agent-ready. Claude, Cursor, any agent runtime can discover and call your API without you writing glue code.

  • Fair, transparent payouts. You set your own price and change it whenever you want (dynamic pricing). Clean split, monthly payouts, no hidden fees. You keep your IP, no exclusivity.

  • Hosting. Keep running it yourself and we route to it, or we host it on our infra and take ops off your plate.

  • We handpick and verify every service before it lists. That's the whole point.

Publishing takes under 10 minutes, I swear.

If you have built an API, what would stop you from listing it somewhere like this? Loss of control? The split? Trust?

Something else? I want the objections as much as the signups. :)

1
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by nikolasdimi@lemmy.world to c/opensource@lemmy.world
 

Went through a competitor's stargazers. Most of them aren't real.

I open sourced an API IDE this year. Same space as Postman, Insomnia and the rest, but at the same time nothing like them: everything is plain text files in your repo, offline, no account etc.

One of the first things I thought and cared about in the early days was of course downloads and installs. And secondarily, it was stars.

And yeah, some of the competitors (that are also open source) have star counts I envied.

And we didnt do bad, we got 1000 stars relatively easily, with the first launches, rollouts. Developers seem to love what we are doing (the fact that we are not trying to clone Postman and make sth unique instead).

Recently I did the grubby founder thing and opened a competitor's stargazers list (one of the big ones). Partly curiosity, partly hoping to find some users or emails to reach out to. Not proud of it but ok, I was just curious to see who are the users.

Except there were almost no people in there.

Accounts a few months old. Zero repos or one fork. No activity. Multiple usernames like 4145243@ere.com. Public emails that were pure gibberish. Pages and pages of this.

How did this happen? : either they bought stars , or bot farms starred them to make the bots themselves look legit. I

In the beginning I was looking up to the stars but it seems they are as about as real as Instagram followers in 2015.

The only thing my outreach scheme found: the audience I was envying might not exist.

p.s. here is the repo of my tool , in case you wanna have a look.

https://github.com/VoidenHQ/voiden (yeah we have 1272 stars right now and they are all actual devs :)

[–] nikolasdimi@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (3 children)

haha the idea comes from the fact that the tool is not opinionated - in the sense that yes its an API client but its also an editor, etc. So it a tool with infinite possibilities and can be as flexible as people want. So this is the idea: void-endlessness-freedom.

If it didn't scare you alot, will you try it? :)

 

Wanted to provide an update around the CLI runner that we shipped a few days ago. This was already on beta for quite some time so now that its on stable, I thought of giving it another go in the community.

For those who are not familiar with the tool and what the h#$@ I am talking about: Voiden is an offline, git-native API tool built on Markdown.

We built it (and then open sourced it) because API tooling sucked (and we work a lot of APIs enough to care to do something about it). I will just name a few issues: cloud dependencies, forced accounts, proprietary formats plus many more.

Long story short, this is Voiden: instead of keeping API requests inside a cloud workspace, Voiden stores them as .void files that can live with your codebase, be versioned in Git, reviewed in PRs, and reused across a team. Plus everything is plain executable markdown. By "everything" I mean really everything: API specs, tests, docs, context...everything.

We have now released the @voiden/runner, which is a headless CLI for running those .void files outside the desktop app.

The runner executes the requests, prints the results, and exits with a standard exit code that CI systems can use.

Things to note:

  • runs on Node.js 18+
  • works in terminal, CI/CD, Docker, and cron jobs
  • supports REST, WebSocket, gRPC, and GraphQL
  • supports request chaining through runtime variables
  • works with core Voiden plugins like scripting, assertions, faker, advanced auth, + more.

The ultimate goal is to make .void files executable API workflows, not just files used inside the desktop app.

The Github repo: https://github.com/VoidenHQ/voiden

Voiden CLI Runner : https://github.com/VoidenHQ/voiden/tree/beta/packages/voiden-runner

Visit Voiden here : https://voiden.md/

P.S this post is mainly around the Runner but every feedback outside that is also welcome, especially coming from any postman or insomnia power users in the room :)

[–] nikolasdimi@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

obsidian, sentry, Voiden (for API work, open sourced it)

[–] nikolasdimi@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

interesting. what is the tool that the company accepts as low risk? Would it be postman or would it be something offline?

[–] nikolasdimi@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

try https://voiden.md/ (not.app)

does it work?

[–] nikolasdimi@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (3 children)

oh. whats the security error?

[–] nikolasdimi@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

thats awesome - let us know what you think when you try!

[–] nikolasdimi@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Our team lives in Git, our communication is happening on slack, our docs written and maintained on confluence and after some time they always drift away from the actual requests inside Postman.

So we built and open sourced Voiden a few months ago: an API tool where all that: specs, tests, context and docs are always together in the same executable plain text file (markdown). We also made this Git native so that every change is versioned and tracked just like code.

The last change we have made is to add a Runner so that one can run the files directly from the terminal and CI/CD pipelines.

here is the tool: https://voiden.md/download repo: https://github.com/VoidenHQ/voiden

welcome to try and give feedback!

 

I am a member of a + 30 people team and most API clients we used felt like they were built for a different job than what we actually did (testing endpoints, maintaining API docs and making sure that new versions of the API matches with out docs). Our team lives in Git, and our docs always drift away from the actual requests inside Postman. The fear I kept hearing when discussing with the team and other devs was "I don't need another bloated API tool".

So we built and open sourced Voiden a few months ago: an offline API tool where requests live as executable markdown and are versioned in Git.

The original idea and inspiration is to combine the flexibility of Obsidian-style files with the simplicity of curl. The result is a tool in which everything can be composed with blocks (endpoint, auth, params, body) that can be added, reused, overridden, and stitched together across executable markdown files.

Results so far: Since open sourcing, we got +12K installs, +1K stars on guthub plus a lot of feedback and contributions.

What it does today:

  • REST, GraphQL, gRPC, WebSockets (as plugins, install only what you need)
  • Ability to compose Requests with API blocks. Reuse, Replace & Version everything just like code.
  • Postman and OpenAPI import so you don't redo years of work Built-in terminal
  • Pre/post request scripting in JS, Python or Shell
  • A batch runner for chaining .void files with env selection and stop-on-failure
  • Agent-friendly CLI, works with Claude and Codex skills
  • We have also a few features in early access, such as the (much anticipated) CLI runner +more

Looking for feedback and ideas from anyone interested.

Github: https://github.com/VoidenHQ/voiden

Download: https://voiden.md/download

[–] nikolasdimi@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

what do you mean beyond the skill level?

[–] nikolasdimi@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)
[–] nikolasdimi@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

depends on the size of your team I guess? Postman used to really be the default API client for serious API testing. https://kaluvuri.com/blog/when-the-category-leader-stalls/

And yes curl is great and is a big inspiration for Voiden. In fact we built it inspired by curl and obsidian.

The problem I see with curl is that real API work is almost never just one request typed into a terminal like some kind of beautifully minimalist Unix haiku. It involves auth, environments, copied headers, reused payload fragments, request chains, documentation, testing, debugging, sharing examples with teammates, reviewing changes in Git, and trying not to break prod because you forgot to swap one token or one base URL.

At that point you can not "just use curl" right?. You use curl plus other things. Curl plus shell scripts, curl plus notes, curl plus env files, plus copied commands from Slack, plus random JSON files, plus tribal knowledge etc etc.. Which is fine I guess but isnt it at some point super annoying and hard to collaborate on? That is the gap that I see this tool (Voiden) trying to solve.

So for me it is not “curl vs Voiden.” curl is a low-level execution tool. Voiden is a workspace for actual API work: writing requests, organizing them, reusing pieces, documenting them, testing them, versioning them in Git, and not duplicating the same headers/body/auth setup 45 times :)

does this resonate?

[–] nikolasdimi@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

what do you currently use? what are the limitations of what you tried and were not happy with?

 

Hey there,

A few months ago we open sourced Voiden, an offline API client we originally built to replace Postman for us internally. Main inspiration was curl and Obsidian (and other plain text editors).

It now has around 11k installs so quite happy with this.

Core principles we built it on:

  • file-based, all plain executable markdown
  • API requests composable through blocks (endpoint, auth, params, body) that can be used, reused, replaced and version in Git, just like code.
  • free, local-first, Git based

Since open sourcing, almost everything that we shipped came from actual users, feedback and contributions.

A few examples was building API workflows (multiple requests in the same file, for example for CRUD flows) and scripting (JS/Python/Shell) before and after requests. Also added a “skills” layer so tools like Claude/Codex can operate directly on .void files and request blocks.

Repo: https://github.com/VoidenHQ/voiden Download: https://voiden.md/download

What I am looking/hoping for:

  • Feedback on the tool itself, especially if you design and test APIs in your work.
  • Ideas and tips from experienced folks on how to improve the visibility of the repo, especially for potential contributors that are looking for projects to contribute on: Adding good first issues, or other labels? (currently not doing that extensively so I am planning to put some structure).

thanks a million, (this is my first post about this in this sub-lemmy, if you are in other ones you might have seen this already)

cheers,

 

Been building Voiden, an API IDE on Electron. Not really “just an API client”, and not a(nother) thin wrapper around a webapp either.

Made it intially available for Windows and Mac, but after getting requests from folks who work on Linux, we added Linux support a few months ago, before open-sourcing it. (That's actually one of the reasons we picked electron :to be able to ship fast and have cross platform consistency across Linux, Mac and Windows.)

Repo: https://github.com/VoidenHQ/voiden

So far, Voiden is available on Linux via:

Definitely considering adding more like Nix or Flatpak, but we are working to get our priorities right: Which ones would you actually use and prefer?

A disclaimer about the tool: Since we didn't want to build yet another (cheaper) clone of Postman, Voiden looks and feels very different:

  • The UI is "programmable": Requests are “built” with slash commands from blocks (endpoints, headers, auth, params, bodies, etc.), like LEGO blocks but for API components. Or like Notion for APIs.

  • These blocks can be also reused in different APIs to have ALL common elements done in one single file. You can then change them once and it will all get updated in all the other docs. Just like in code when we add an extra logic to an imported method. (In other API clients you would need to duplicate stuff or just use environment variables to substitute.)

  • API Specs, tests, and docs live together in executable Markdown.

Welcome to try it out and let us know: what works, what breaks, and which packaging or distro support would make Voiden easiest for you?

Strong opinions are encouraged. :)

Github : https://github.com/VoidenHQ/voiden Download here : https://voiden.md/download

Git native, No login, No accounts, No telemetry.

 

hey there,

There is always a temptation to add "something AI" in new tools. Especially to tools that are somehow related to developer productivity.

At the same time I wanted to avoid this temptation with Voiden. So there is currently nothing screaming "AI" in it even though I can potentially see many many use cases.

This is also one of the main reasons I think that a plugin architecture is best. What was actually in my mind is that not adding AI is ok for now and the community will start coming up and building AI plugins. For example creating docs from specs and vice versa.

Any other use cases you can think that could be applicable to a tool like this? (Dev Tool with executable markdown files for API specs, tests and docs). The first plugins we shipped were more around methods (grpc, graph ql, web sockets etc etc).

repo: https://github.com/VoidenHQ/feedback

 
1
Heavenly - Atta girl (www.youtube.com)
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by nikolasdimi@lemmy.world to c/90smusic@lemmy.world
 

fuck you, no way!

 

this my take on a matisse painting, that you can find here.

https://www.clickatlife.gr/fu/p/228858/1200/10000/00000000005fd2d3/1/matisse.jpg

I thought of an idea: take your pencil and make your version this :) will be funny to see how different people translate this.

view more: next ›