moon

joined 2 years ago
[–] moon@lemmy.cafe 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

People can't even think of any other propaganda besides Tianamin Square lol

[–] moon@lemmy.cafe 1 points 2 years ago (3 children)

The free market is going very well here

[–] moon@lemmy.cafe 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Hell yeah. If Valve was smart, they'd have pushed for this a lot sooner. They should focus on making it more device-agnostic. If the consumer's device revolves around their storefront, then it's a massive win for them.

[–] moon@lemmy.cafe 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I personally think that's a bit much to block an entire instance over when just one admin is being mildly annoying. Their comment is basically nothing imo lol. Compare that to the OP of this post whose profile picture is a cartoon pony from a children's show having an orgasm.

[–] moon@lemmy.cafe 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

How is it not as good as a physical sim? They are the same rates.

[–] moon@lemmy.cafe 1 points 2 years ago

Having the right to have a mass killing device is never required.

[–] moon@lemmy.cafe 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

We're referring to discovering old posts here, not when you already have a post open.

[–] moon@lemmy.cafe 0 points 2 years ago (3 children)

This is more of a front end thing. Mastodon sometimes revives old content by people boosting an old post that could go viral again. Lemmy's algo is designed around hiding older posts as they age. I could see this being more relevant in upcoming software like Discourse and phpbb which are adding fedi support. They're more traditional old-school forum software and I think that revives older content better, as one user commenting on an old post will bring up a thread to the top again.

[–] moon@lemmy.cafe 0 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Android already has had this for many years and it is not an issue. We don't need to deal with hypotheticals here, Android has put these things into practice for a long time already, and it's a non issue.

[–] moon@lemmy.cafe 0 points 2 years ago (7 children)

I have no idea why so many of those commenters are anti consumer rights. Android proves that it's not a security issue. Why are they so brain broken that they are actively against opening up their walled garden, like it compromise their apple product purchases in some way.

[–] moon@lemmy.cafe 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

That it's objectively false to stir up attention

Your title implies it was directly killed, when it factually was not.

[–] moon@lemmy.cafe 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

What a bad taste title

view more: next ›