Not better; different. They behave the way the people doing the watching want them to behave. Whether that's better is purely situational, and that (among others) is why global surveillance is a bad idea.
jwt
joined 2 years ago
So, still a step up from his predecessor, you say?
(fyi: that dmesg output means it needs to be run with sudo to show actual info)
Luckily it has been archived already: https://web.archive.org/web/20260617080012/https://tvpworld.com/93853352/world-bank-hails-polands-remarkable-transformation-as-lending-phase-ends
For context, this is the place they're testing the 20km/h speed limit at. There's no reasonable explanation to go faster than 20 km/h there anyway, regardless of legal limits.
Not a dig at you or the script author, but I'm kinda miffed we're relegated to running some rando github user's bash scripts to check if we're affected. This is the direct opposite response one should have to this kind of attack. I feel the AUR maintainers should have been more forthcoming about what they are doing to stop the attack and how users can mitigate the consequences if affected.
Comment
Seems rather unenforceable to me as I think you have to prove intent. A teacher that wants to wear a baseball cap to hide his bald spot is allowed to do so, but a teacher wearing a kippah can't? What if the bald guy wants to wear a kippah to hide his bald spot?
Also, the (upcoming) amendment feels performative in nature. There's no way schools struggle with this issue, and I think they rather have politicians actually help them deal with real issues (like class sizes, dealing with social media, etc.)
Hey now, it "endangers us all" if they scan the BBC.
... orange face book ...
The trump/zuck collab you hope will never see the light of day.
🎶You can call me AI🎶
view more: next ›
I saw Fossify has a launcher in beta available in f-droid. May not be up to your needs (yet?) though, but worth a try.