jeremyparker

joined 2 years ago

This. I didn’t work in hospitality for very long, and I wasn’t the most gracious or understanding undiagnosed autistic person out there, and even I didn’t really give a shit.

Side note: As a bus boy at a very fancy restaurant, I had a little “crumber” for scraping up crumbs, and I didn’t, like, want to marry the crumbs, but, the way the crumber glided across the white cotton tablecloth, which had that soft but firm feel that you can only achieve after a thousand washings…

Let’s just say, you can put up with a lot of shit when you know you got that glide in your future.

[–] jeremyparker@programming.dev 2 points 2 weeks ago

Omfg I feel personally attacked by several of these memes

[–] jeremyparker@programming.dev 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I locked myself out of the house this morning. The weather app on my phone said it “felt like” -2 degrees, and I agree with it.

I had my coat and hat, but my legs were underprepared, I was wearing sweatpants without long underwear.

My wife was at work about a mile away and she didn’t see my texts for about a half hour. I could’ve walked to her work in that time, but I was so paralyzed by the situation that I couldn’t do it.

(We live in a big city, we walk or bike everywhere, or take trains when it’s far. Walking to her work is normal…but cold is cold.)

I have “a thing” about not wearing clothes like that outside, and I’ve only ever done it once or twice, I just went out to bring my kid to school a few blocks away… I have a lot of “things.” And I don’t deal with crises super well; my actions tend to be ok but my communication fails.

So anyway, I eventually got frustrated with my wife’s lack of response and I texted her in a frustrated tone. If the situation was reversed, I would’ve raced back home to save her, and if I had missed the texts, I would’ve been apologetic, and more than understanding if she was frustrated.

She said I should’ve called instead of texting, but I couldn’t talk. She called me and I tried to tell her I couldn’t talk but she insisted. I ended up hanging up on her, which is…not good. She wouldn’t listen, “I don’t want to text” she said. She’s very verbally oriented; she spends like half her time on the phone with her sister or her mother. I prefer being quiet, and I frequently just can’t.

I had immediately apologized for my frustrated tone and for hanging up; I learned to apologize a long time ago and I mean it when I do it.

It felt like she didn’t want to have to go out in the cold, take time out of work, and go through the effort of coming to help me. I get that, it was very cold, but.., idk, I guess sometimes you do it anyway? It felt like she was using my rudeness as an excuse to not help or to be mad about helping.

I had gone out to drop off my kid without my keys, but we have a garage door and a little keypad for it. I knew I didn’t have my keys but I also knew i had a fallback. The batteries in the keypad had been dying for a while, which made it not work in the cold; the problem was resolved — until today.

She called again, I think just to yell at me. She had already texted telling me she had left work and was headed home to help; she didn’t call to tell me that. She was furious on the phone. I hung up on her when she said she hated me. I think hanging up on her may be the most egregious offense; I try not to do it, I know she hates it, but idk, I guess sometimes you do it anyway?

I tried warming up the keypad with my hands; I alternated hands, one under my shirt on my bare stomach to warm up while the other hand exhausted its warmth on the keypad. Shockingly, it worked.

I told her immediately and tried to avoid communicating after that. I think we talked on the phone again? I don’t remember. I apologized several more times — not “I’m sorry but”, it was just “I’m sorry”, with a “I hope you can understand the situation I was in” afterwards.

Our “fight” has not yet been resolved and there next time I see her, or kids will be there and maybe also one of my parents, so we won’t be able to talk about it. Not that there’s anything to talk about. Either I will grovel and agree that I did everything awful and she was perfect, or we deal with a cloud over our heads for a few days until she/we eventually move on, and it just gets added to the vague cloud of indecipherable reasons why she should’ve married someone else.

Sorry to dump on the thread, I needed to vent and I don’t really have anywhere safe to do it.

[–] jeremyparker@programming.dev 1 points 5 months ago

In that very specific way I am not like a lost bat, but in many other ways I am exactly like one.

[–] jeremyparker@programming.dev 3 points 5 months ago

For me the noise and over stimulation is a big part of it, but there’s also a much more complex web of expectations that I don’t understand, and my “over confidence” (read: my failure to have adequately absorbed the cultural suppression of self esteem) tends to put me into a social position that someone with me lack of skills should not have.

When I do a conference presentation (like I’m preparing for later this week), I can prepare a very scripted set of remarks, and that tends to go well, but off the cuff, I feel like a plate of spaghetti.

[–] jeremyparker@programming.dev 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

So you're saying you want a federated wiki that uses a blockchain??? Genius.

Kidding aside, you're absolutely right. Wikipedia is one of the very few if not ONLY examples of centralized tech that ISN'T absolute toxic garbage. Is it perfect? No. From what I understand, humans are involved in it, so, no, it's not perfect.

If you want to federate some big ol toxic shit hole, Amazon, Netflix, any of Google's many spywares -- there's loads of way more shitty things we would benefit from ditching.


Edit: the "federated Netflix" -- I know it sounds weird, but I actually think it would be really cool. Think of it more like Nebula+YouTube: "anyone" (anyone federated with other instances) can "upload" videos, and subcription fees go mostly to the creator with a little going to The Federation. Idk the payment details, that would be hard, but no one said beating Netflix would be easy.

And federated Amazon -- that seems like fish in a barrel, or low hanging fruit, whichever you prefer. Complicated and probably a lot more overhead, but not conceptually challenging.

[–] jeremyparker@programming.dev 1 points 2 years ago

Where's the button I can press to project this comment onto the moon

[–] jeremyparker@programming.dev 0 points 2 years ago

You seem very upset about this. I doubt this will help since it doesn't seem like your reasoning is influenced by logic, but, the fact that there are fraudulent doctors and diagnoses doesn't mean science isn't real.

[–] jeremyparker@programming.dev 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Things that are scientifically provable are valid.

 

In CSS, let's talk about srcset or image-set. In that context, you can define which image the browser loads using 1x, 2x, 3x, etc. These refer to pixel density. (In the case of srcset, you can use pixel dimensions too, which sidesteps the issue I'm going to talk about, but it still occurs in image-set, and also is still weird to me in srcset, even if you can side step it.)

So, assuming, say, a 20" monitor with 1080p resolution is 1x, then a 10" screen with 1080p would be, technically, 2x - though, in the real world, it's more like a 6" screen has a 1000x2500 resolution - so, I don't care about math, that's somewhere between 2x and 3x.

Let's imagine a set of images presented like this:

srcset(image_1000x666.webp 1x,
image_1500x1000.webp 2x,
image_3000x2000.webp 3x)

then an iphone 14 max (a 6"-ish screen with a 1000x2500-ish resolution, for a 2-3x pixel density), would load the 3000x2000 image, but my 27", 1440p monitor would load the 1000x666px image.

It seems intuitively backwards - but I've confirmed it - according to MDN, 1x = smaller image, 3x = larger image.

But as I understand it, an iphone 14 acts as if its a 300x800 screen - using the concept of "points" instead of pixels - which, in the context of "1x" image size makes a lot of sense - but the browser isn't reading that, all it seems to care about is how many pixels are in an inch.

I made a little page to demonstrate the issue, tho I acknowledge it's not hugely helpful, since, other than using your actual eyeballs, it's hard to tell which image is loaded in the scrset example, but take a look if you want.

https://germyparker.github.io/image-srcset-example/