Have you seen it at the end of the universe?
funkyshoe
It has a spooky presence and for some reason it's also quite mundane.
Nah. Good one but no
Practicing can alleviate aphantasia and it matches how people describe an internal screen. Like your watching stuff inside your head. It's kinda flat and small and contained in a way, distinctly different than how people do out of body experiences for example.
Also one difference I've noted in descriptions and myself is that imagining can repeat. You imagine something and can do it multiple times quite accurately. Whereas an experience gets kinda corrupted, lost in memory. I have no way to repicture this event with my mind/imagination so I took to 3d tools.
I don't see much as mystical anymore.
Asking is probably not usual. Some scientists do their thesises through seeing the result first. It's different to imagine something internally than to "go to"/"get" something else, the latter being something that someone else knows as well rather than self-born. Although I guess one could expand to the thought that everything internal ultimately is everything external yada yada
Haven't heard of that. Adding to the watchlist thanks. Maybe someone in the credits got that somewhere
It's funny how they act like they're in a conspiracy movie
Don't really like them
I was rewriting the word so many times I couldn't trust the word in any form anymore :D
appreciate it thanks. I'm familiar with camera gimbals and such as a steadying tool, but didn't connect that topic with whatever this is.
Oh that I didn't get from skimming Wikipedia. Because of a loss of freedom/control or am mistaking the concept?
I didn't understand the timing of why these discs align so it's not accurate in the animation but it seemed cyclical/mechanical/mathematic, like a pulse towards various different directions
Another movie spotting, creatives seem to revolve around this hmm