funkyshoe

joined 1 year ago
[–] funkyshoe@piefed.social 1 points 2 weeks ago

Another movie spotting, creatives seem to revolve around this hmm

[–] funkyshoe@piefed.social 2 points 2 weeks ago

Have you seen it at the end of the universe?

[–] funkyshoe@piefed.social 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It has a spooky presence and for some reason it's also quite mundane.

[–] funkyshoe@piefed.social 1 points 2 weeks ago

Nah. Good one but no

[–] funkyshoe@piefed.social 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Practicing can alleviate aphantasia and it matches how people describe an internal screen. Like your watching stuff inside your head. It's kinda flat and small and contained in a way, distinctly different than how people do out of body experiences for example.

Also one difference I've noted in descriptions and myself is that imagining can repeat. You imagine something and can do it multiple times quite accurately. Whereas an experience gets kinda corrupted, lost in memory. I have no way to repicture this event with my mind/imagination so I took to 3d tools.

I don't see much as mystical anymore.

[–] funkyshoe@piefed.social 1 points 2 weeks ago

Asking is probably not usual. Some scientists do their thesises through seeing the result first. It's different to imagine something internally than to "go to"/"get" something else, the latter being something that someone else knows as well rather than self-born. Although I guess one could expand to the thought that everything internal ultimately is everything external yada yada

[–] funkyshoe@piefed.social 1 points 2 weeks ago

Haven't heard of that. Adding to the watchlist thanks. Maybe someone in the credits got that somewhere

[–] funkyshoe@piefed.social 2 points 2 weeks ago

It's funny how they act like they're in a conspiracy movie

[–] funkyshoe@piefed.social 2 points 2 weeks ago

Don't really like them

[–] funkyshoe@piefed.social 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I was rewriting the word so many times I couldn't trust the word in any form anymore :D

[–] funkyshoe@piefed.social 2 points 2 weeks ago

appreciate it thanks. I'm familiar with camera gimbals and such as a steadying tool, but didn't connect that topic with whatever this is.

[–] funkyshoe@piefed.social 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

Oh that I didn't get from skimming Wikipedia. Because of a loss of freedom/control or am mistaking the concept?

I didn't understand the timing of why these discs align so it's not accurate in the animation but it seemed cyclical/mechanical/mathematic, like a pulse towards various different directions

16
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by funkyshoe@piefed.social to c/asklemmy@lemmy.world
 

I made a blender model and animation of this thing I experienced to show how it looks like and moves, and to use that as a way to find out if someone knows what it is, where or why. I don't know much more and am wondering what others know based on their encounters. It's somewhere at some time, seems huge. The discs are flattish and don't reflect light other than from the edges. I've tried posting in a few communities and get mostly aggravated answers, or overtly focusing on how I got this knowledge (almost like I've done something forbidden when it's not an aspect I care about), and one got modded hidden.

view more: next ›