fullofredgoo
joined 2 years ago
First comment on the post:
James Kettle: Hi, I’m the author of this research. It’s great to see interest and I can promise some quality research and a strong argument to kill HTTP/1.1 but the headline of this article goes a bit too far. The specific CDN vulnerabilities have been disclosed to the vendors and patched (hence the past tense in the abstract) – I wouldn’t drop zero day on a CDN! That said I do expect to see fresh critical CDN vulnerabilities in future – hopefully found by a white hat!
From the article:
"The majority in this case made the independence of its analysis explicit, writing: "Montana case law interpreting the Individual Dignity provisions directs our analysis, not federal precedent." The dissent cited Trump v. Orr and Skrmetti—both hostile federal rulings—but the majority rejected them outright. What this means in practice is that Montana's transgender residents now have a constitutional shield completely independent of the Supreme Court of the United State’s decisions."