eigenspace

I don't really disagree, but it does make me wonder what the future of the right to asylum will look like if the lesson becomes "temporary asylum seekers will never go home, and you won't be allowed to force them because they've put down too many roots"

I worry that the backlash against this stuff is going to ensure that we're unable to help future waves of asylum seekers, which are certainly going to be coming.

Good! Fuck Washington.

Merz is a pig and a populist who is flailing about looking for distractions, but it's also frustrating how much discussion on this stuff turns to left-wing people reflexively defending and making excuses for something that most people can clearly see is a problem in modern European cities, and that problem is coming from predominantly young, poor, male, muslim migrants in parts of cities that are quickly becoming ghettoized.

Often people will just say that European chirstians have a horrible history of abuse towards women, which is of course 100% true, but also not really relevant when the question is "do we want to let in more of these people into the country, or less?"

Makes sense. PV is dirt cheap with or without subsidies, and there's already so much solar generation that every mildly sunny day produces so much solar that the electricity prices swing to zero before spiking back up when the sun goes down.

If subsidy money is going to be spent, it should be spent on things that people wouldn't do without a subsidy, and is productive for the grid. In this case, I think if anything for small, residential homes is going to be subsidized, it should be home batteries.

Believe it or not, cars are already banned from bikelanes and parks in Amsterdam. I hope this helps.

There is a hard speed limit on them. The thing about these Fatbike brands is that they are purposefully made it very very easy to disable the speed limiter, and make it widely known how to do it.

Fatbikes in the Netherlands are a group of e-bike brands that purposefully make it extremely easy to remove their government required speed regulator, and are particularly popular among certain demographics of young immigrant men to use as basically electric motorcycles (since they can be controlled with a thumb-throttle instead of pedaling).

Because there's a mixture of these bikes causing real problems on the roads, and them being popular young brown dudes, a lot of different forces in the Netherlands are pretty upset about them and want them banned.

Okay, that is a fair and relevant example. I do think it's worth noting though that Volvo is a bit of an outlier here. I also just don't see how we decouple from the USA without having trade barriers.

I mean, maybe there's things the EU or Sweden can or should do to force Volvo not to do that, but since they already let Volvo be bought up by China, I'm not sure it'd even be practical or possible.

Nobody relevant is moving production lines from Europe to America, because it'd be insane to do so with how fast the tariff rates are constantly changing, and the fact that the US Supreme Court could end up ruling that Trump isn't even allowed to set tariff rates. Even if the tariffs became stable though, european manufacturers won't move their production lines to the USA because most advanced manufacturing relies on a complex, global supply chain. This means that tons of parts for e.g. cars need to cross borders multiple times, and often get double or triple tariffed, making it more attractive to move the production line out of the USA, and just sell the finished car in the USA and eat the tariff once.

Our products being less competitive there due to tariffs will result in lower sales, and will mean that our companies will focus on other markets, which is a good thing. If our companies rely on exports to the USA in order to be solvent, then that makes us more vulnerable to the USA. A 15% tariff is not enough to drive our exporters out, because they still easily outcompete in lots of categories, but it makes it less attractive for them to sell to the USA when they could sell elsewhere, which is on the whole, a good thing IMO.

A tax on Big Tech for example could’ve been a firm response, both to hurt American interests and catalyze our migration away from their services.

No disagreement here. The EU representatives likely chose to not do that one so they could buy more time to be more prepared for a louder phase or the trade war (or for Trump to get bogged down in another topic and forget about Europe). It's looking unavoidable now, so I hope they go for a firmer approach that targets American big tech.

It's silly to say the EU is capitulating though.

IMO, the tariffs are not such a big deal. If we want to decouple from the USA, them tariffing us is a good way to start that process in a gentle and controlled manner. Us tariffing them is IMO a low priority. They barely export any physical goods to Europe that are competitive with domestic EU products. The thing that Americans sell us that we need to stop buying is software and cloud services, but those are not affected by tariffs.

Therefore it's a waste of time and money for us to tariff the USA. What we need to do is make a targetted effort to get off of their software and cloud tech stack. This is already happening rather quickly, but the EU needs to do more to make it happen faster. The Anti-Coercion Instrument will help a lot if the EU triggers it, but there's also a lot more subtle things the EU can do (some of which are already underway).

The trade deal was an empty promise to America that gave them nothing. They "promised" investments and purchases that the EU has no ability or willingness to actually follow through on to just make him go away and get distracted by something else.

It wasn't a particularly brave response, and not my favoured way to deal with him, but if you think it was capitulation, then you're as gullible as Trump.

If you were paying attention it shouldn't be surprising. Privacy is the sort of thing that Germans generally get very worked up about.