dsilverz

joined 10 months ago
[–] dsilverz@calckey.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

@m_f@discuss.online @thefarside@sh.itjust.works

This comic has music... Why do I hear boss music? ("...But what's this that I can't see with ice cold hands, taking hold on me?")

Luckily for the rest of the bystanders, Death is quite fond of the pizza in Chicago. Unlucky day for this guy's cardiac muscle, though...

Scene from Supernatural TV series S05E21, depicting a man who literally stumbled upon Death, moments before falling dead.

[–] dsilverz@calckey.world -5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

@skarn@discuss.tchncs.de @Solumbran@lemmy.world @linux@lemmy.ml

Have you considered the possibility that, by "finding a bug" and possibly "suggesting" a "patch", the LLM could be smuggling another bug unbeknownst to the vibe coder(s) and/or smuggling a technical debt?

I say this as someone who've been coding since my 8s (now I'm 30), someone who hasn't the tribalistic anti-AI sentiment (I even use LLMs sometimes, particularly the non-Western ones such as Deepseek and Qwen) but understands LLMs enough to know how the (current, state-of-the-art) stochastic parrots shouldn't be trusted the source code of any slightly serious project, especially a full browser that Firefox is. Chances are devs are going to blindly trust and obediently stage-and-commit whatever the parroting machine spits out, and this can end up really messy. Given the ongoing pivot to AI from Mozilla, I doubt they're worried about the consequences of vibe coding, though.

[–] dsilverz@calckey.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

@dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works TIL Philipp Mainländer, David Benatar and countless other competent philosophers were/are all teenagers doing teenager ramblings!

[–] dsilverz@calckey.world 14 points 1 month ago (4 children)

@ennof@feddit.org @LuminousLuddite@lemmy.world @technology@lemmy.world

As if it were a matter of caring or wanting/not wanting to use websites... It would be really nice to live in such a world where one could have the luxury of "choosing". Unfortunately, it's not this world for many people and many peoples.

To exemplify this, there are websites I, as a Brazilian, can't simply choose whether to use or not, because there are government and bureau websites for services through which I'm expected to comply with citizen things I didn't ask for (as I didn't ask to be born in this world to begin with). Online services such as "DETRAN" (state-wise transportation bureaus where one must renew one's driver's license), which I remember having to click a reCAPTCHA in order to proceed with transportation-related citizen duties. I can't have the luxury of saying "you know what, I'm not renewing my driver's license which has become my ID for a plethora of services not even related to driving, which means I'm going ID-less and becoming a legally-indigent person in the eyes of the next cop that requests my ID".

Hell, I can't even choose to have a degoogled phone because our customs (Receita Federal) will likely deny the entry for any "unlicensed device" (i.e. devices not licensed by ANATEL, Brazilian telecommunication agency). And installing a custom ROM in any available device is not without the risk of bricking the device (and losing a monthly minimum wage worth of money spent with said device) especially for someone like me who never installed custom ROMs.

Again, would be really awesome to live in the world you described where one could afford "caring to use" things...

[–] dsilverz@calckey.world 2 points 1 month ago

@Grimy@lemmy.world @a_gee_dizzle@lemmy.ca

"Some free advice? You ever get back there, you hoard toilet paper. You understand me? Hoard it. Hoard it like it's made of gold. 'Cause it is." (Chuck Shurley, Supernatural TV series, S05E04)

[–] dsilverz@calckey.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

@Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com @Memes@lemmy.dbzer0.com

you didn't answer my question

Your only question in your earlier reply was "you don't think oil and gas kills way way more?", to which I replied with a counter-question about two things being true simultaneously, and then I said "I'm not saying oil and gas are harmless, much to the contrary", recalling my earlier excerpt about things buried by Mother Nature, things of which, if you didn't catch it initially, are oil (and by extension gas) as well as radioactive minerals (those containing uranium, plutonium, etc).

So yes, I did answer your question.

There's no need for nuance when cats kill 1,000 times more

So? What do you suggest we do with cats and how the heck could instinctive behavior, a behavior of which is found among species that predates us human, compare to artificially melting rocks and sand merged to mimick the naturally occurring photosynthesis in a very rough manner?

Because I didn't criticize PV just for the sake of it, I said several times how PV panels could benefit of having a vantablack surface that could absorb the most sunlight possible while reflecting the least specular light possible. Still you seem to be deliberately ignoring those parts from a content you dismissed as a "wall of text" (while you're curiously accusing me of being unwilling to discuss).

To blame renewables

You just strawman-d a constructive critique of mine about photovoltaic panels (in which, again, I didn't say "we should stop using PV", for Goddess sake) to "blaming (all) renewables", which I defy you to quote and point out the excerpt from my replies where I supposedly said that. If you can't pinpoint the excerpt where I say something in the lines "we should stop using renewables" or "we should stop using PV", then I gentle ask you don't put words in my fingers that I didn't wrote.

[–] dsilverz@calckey.world -1 points 1 month ago (3 children)

@Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com @Memes@lemmy.dbzer0.com

See my other replies in this sub thread, where I'm explaining the nuances behind this matter.

The thing is, that yes, even windows kills birds.

I agree with you in this regard. Window panes are as reflective as solar panels. But then we humans tend to place solar farms where it used to be the habitat for wildlife because we humans can't be bothered to have football fields worth of blue mirrors potentially reflecting sunlight towards apartments during specific moments of the day.

Again, I'm not against PV, much to the contrary, it's the best we have (after all, every type of energy source stems from solar energy under the hood, so why not siphon directly from the source?), but I'm the kind of person who tries to ponder about both sides of the coin, hence why (if you noticed) my initial comment wasn't without ideas to solve this issue (making the panels vantablack, for example).

You know what kills birds 1.000 times more than all three combined? Cats.

Just like owls kills mice and small mammals with such an amazingly ruthless impetus, and...? Were talking about natural hunters doing instinctive hunting, a situation very different from our artificial apparata doing artificial harms to the environment, an environment of which predates our existence as the Homo sapiens species we are. Solar panels as we crafted these don't naturally occur in Nature.

It’s an invented “discussion” to blame renewables. You don’t think oil&gas kills way way way way more?

Did you know two things can be true at once? I'm not saying oil and gas are harmless, much to the contrary. Perhaps you didn't even read my whole comment where I said "some things buried by Mother Nature should stay buried". I don't mean to be rude but I suggest you read my initial comment again in all of its entirety.

[–] dsilverz@calckey.world 1 points 1 month ago

@The_Decryptor@aussie.zone @Memes@lemmy.dbzer0.com

By "I don't know why solar panels have to be this reflective", I meant PV panels as well. Yes, the article I linked, regarding Ivanpah, refers to a solar thermal, which is worse give the way its designed as a panopticon conjuring a death ray out of sunlight. But solar panels aren't less unsafe for beings high in the skies:

They’re also mostly falling out of favour, losing out to photovoltaic panels. Which are simpler to make, operate, and are vastly cheaper to boot, while also not being reflective (They are protected by a layer of glass, so there’s a minimum amount of reflection simply because they’re smooth, but they’re not mirrors).

I tend to disagree. The glass coating is still a flat smooth glass, practically similar to that of a mirror. Should the glass coating be rough, it would reduce the specular reflection, but this would likely affect the absorption of sunlight by the PV semiconductors.

On top of that, we're talking about a pair of eyes seeing the reflection from height, which won't be the same as if you stare at it standing in ground level. In fact, pilots can get temporarily blinded by solar panels and this can pose dangers to aviation (as per IATA).

If trained humans are affected, you betcha birds are even more affected by having eyes more sensitive than ours. Hence my comment on this regard, because we humans have this annoying bias of worrying more about other humans (because, after all, we're humans) than worrying about the countless other species who have been inhabiting Earth way before an hominin descended from the tree to play with fire and having a "cogito ergo sum" delusional moment. I'm not saying we shouldn't worry about other humans, I'm saying we are far from being the only tenant species temporarily inhabiting this Pale Blue Dot.

[–] dsilverz@calckey.world 0 points 1 month ago

@naught101@lemmy.world @Memes@lemmy.dbzer0.com

That 6000 figure is from a solar thermal plant, not solar PV.

Yes, but PV has a highly reflective coating, which reflects sunlight almost like a mirror. It won't burn the birds, but then we get to another part of your reply:

Solar panel reflections are nothing like lasers.

Which is correct to a certain extent... but looking at a mirror which is reflecting the sunlight doesn't seem that nice to the eyes, especially sensitive eyes of a bird looking at it from height (where the sunlight reflection may or may not converge from multiple panels positioned together, hence my analogy to lasers) and possibly mistaking it for a lake (glass panels aren't something naturally occurring, it's something we hominids built, something unbeknownst to other species, so the chances are the reflective surface will seem like the surface of a water body, especially in deserts where the bird will be thirsty). This "Siren call from the light" is similar to how moths end up colliding with lamps: they don't know the concept of "light emitter" so their instincts mistake it for the Full Moon which means mating.

Notice: birds being killed by solar panels doesn't necessarily mean the panels are directly killing them; rather, it's the specular reflection from their glass coating rendering the birds disoriented (because, again, the thing looks like a lake but isn't a lake), which in turn will expose them to unnecessary risks, such as being temporarily blinded (akin to how drivers can get blinded from getting headlights unwittingly blasting at their eyes) and/or colliding mid-flight due to misguided spatial notion and unseen obstacles. Because it's an avian death indirectly (and not directly) caused by the panels, it's unlikely to become statistics, it'll likely look like the bird died of "natural causes". In fact, many human activities indirectly kill birds, especially when we talk about climate change, and I guess/hope you know how this lack of direct harm doesn't mean climate change isn't doing harms to wildlife.

And owls would not be affected because they fly at night…

Seems like you don't know some of the amazing diurnal and crepuscular owls yet, so here it goes:

- Surnia ulula (Northern Hawk Owl, primarily diurnal):
https://birdsoftheworld.org/bow/species/nohowl/cur/introduction
- Asio flammeus (Short-eared Owl, active day and night):
https://birdsoftheworld.org/bow/species/sheowl/cur/introduction
- Athene cunicularia (Burrowing Owl, one of my favorites, active day and night): https://birdsoftheworld.org/bow/species/burowl/cur/introduction
- Bubo virginianus (Great Horned Owl, can be active during twilight): https://birdsoftheworld.org/bow/species/grhowl/cur/behavior

There are others, and as I said in another reply in this thread, there's the possibility that a nocturnal owl will be disturbed by something (corvids harassing her, or human activity) which will force her to wake up and flee to a safer place.

[–] dsilverz@calckey.world 1 points 1 month ago (6 children)

@Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com @Memes@lemmy.dbzer0.com

What exactly are you referring to? My comment is lengthy and mentions a lot of things.

[–] dsilverz@calckey.world 0 points 1 month ago

@OwOarchist@pawb.social @Memes@lemmy.dbzer0.com

lol, why specify both here? Tell me more about these non-bird avians and/or these non-avian birds…

At least to me, an ESL (English as a second language) person, both words carry different meanings:

Birds = Passeriformes, such as corvids, mockingbirds, parakeets, etc...
Avians = everyone else from Aves clade, especially the "larger" ones, such as owls, falcons, eagles and swans, but also hawks and chickens.

In Portuguese (I'm Brazilian) we have "pássaros" and "aves", which are definitely going to refer to different winged beings, and owls aren't passerines, therefore they'd be more of an "ave" than a "pássaro".

Both of these categories, however, have species that are equally going to be affected by solar panels, hence my distinction and inclusiveness.

Aren’t they only active at night, though?

That's the beauty of Strigiformes: there are lots of misconceptions about owls in what our common sense believes. There are diurnal and crepuscular owls, such as the northern hawk-owl (Surnia ulula) and the burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia, although she isn't used to fly as higher as her cousins because, and here's another common sense belief to be broken, she doesn't nest on trees and other higher places, she nests underground).

Many owls are crepuscular, active during dawn/dusk when the sun has a lower apparent angle. Depending on the solar panels' position and arrangement (e.g. solar panels facing slightly north/south), this means a sunlight reflected towards the far horizon instead of reflecting upwards. Given how the sunlight during dawn/dusk is fainter, yeah, it's not gonna burn the avians/birds, however it'll definitely blind them if they're flying towards the solar panels, because they'll be looking directly at a focused and magnified sunglare.

And even the so-defined "nocturnal owls" may meet the sunlight, either by being faced by danger/annoyance during sleep/roosting (such as corvids harassing owls or evil hominids attacking owls, among other situations requiring the owl to wake up and flee) or (a guess of mine) by getting active earlier during summer (when sunset happens later than usual), then they'll face the same problem as their crepuscular/diurnal cousins.

[–] dsilverz@calckey.world -1 points 1 month ago (14 children)

@naught101@lemmy.world @OwOarchist@pawb.social @Memes@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Sadly, solar panels do kill thousands of birds/avians.

[...] the largest solar power plant in the world, Ivanpah Solar Plant, located in the Mojave Desert in California, is believed to be responsible for at least 6,000 bird deaths each year, as the birds can suffer severe burns or become incinerated if they fly too close to the 40-foot towers that concentrate sunlight from five square miles of solar panels. These numbers are likely an underestimation, as the sight of birds and insects rapidly immolated as they soar too close to the towers, which can reach temperatures of 1000 degrees Fahrenheit

(Source)

Even when birds don't get burnt alive, the reflection of the sunlight from the surface of solar panels is akin to pointing lasers at airplanes and ending up blinding the pilots.

And as I've been an owl-biased person lately, I'd say owls are likely going to be the most affected because their breathtakingly beautiful deep eyes are larger than most avians, therefore having more surface area for the reflected sunlight to blind them, and because they're so reliant on their accurate vision to hunt, blindness will definitely mean death...

I don't know why solar panels have to be this reflective, (yeah, I know, there's a glass protecting the semiconductor from the elements, still) it even seems counterintuitive because you're losing lots of energy in form of reflected light. Ideally, solar panels should be akin to a vantablack, totally dark and, therefore, as fully light-absorbing as possible, practically a human-made optical black hole.

Still, solar energy seems gazillion times better than both nuclear and fossil fuels, because some things that were buried by Mother Nature should stay buried, and both nuclear and fossil fuels digs things that Mother Nature have been burying for ages. Should nuclear power facilities need more nuclear fuel, there are currently 12,187 (as of 2025, maybe an outdated number from Federation of American Scientists) potential sources for the carcinogenic hot stone eager to be dismantled by way more sane scientists instead of being used by "M.A.D." (iykwim) hominids in green garments and boots.

 

Putting the ART in ARTificial gravity

This is both an artistic experiment with engineering and a social experiment, given how my usual kind of art (occult symbolism, owls, etc) may feel too complicated for many and it's often met with indifference. Yeah, aerospace engineering is also complicated (after all, it's literally "rocket science"), but it feels to me like this kind of subject (hard sci-fi, Star Trek, etc) is more "socially sanctioned" in Fediverse than my usual kind of subject...

Given the latest happening involving my time-lapses (which I've been trying to post as a proof of human authorship), this time I'm not posting it. I do have the time-lapse for this art, if anyone is interested in seeing how I drew.

Alt-text:

A schematics-like digital art entitled "Artificial gravity for space travel: schematics for torque counterbalancing inspired on real helicopters that have no tail rotors", divided in two panels.

Both panels feature a isometric view of a faintly translucent spacecraft with a gray hull and front-facing cockpit (whose window shows 3 people inside, one of them upside-down weeee-ing in microgravity behind the other 2) very similar in shape to the NASA's Space Shuttle (I actually thought of it as I drew), but with a pair of big ionic thrusters (emitting a strong purple glow) at the rear, as well as a pair of large rotating rings attached to the top of the hull, meant as a centrifuge for artificial gravity. The rings, rotating in opposite directions so to cancel out a torque that would otherwise inflict attitude onto the ship (as per Newton's 3rd Law), are attached through 3 equidistant I-beams to a smaller cylinder (which doubles as a hallway from/to the rest of the ship) which, in turn, is attached to the husk, in different configurations across the panels.

The first panel, "option A: vertically stacked opposing wheels", is self-descriptive: the rings are on top of each other, rotating in opposite directions in the same axis, much akin to coaxial-rotor helicopters (e.g. Sikorsky S-69).

The second, "option B: paired opposing wheels", features a configuration akin to transverse-rotor helicopters (e.g. Landgraf H-2), but with a wingspan slightly angled backwards. Each ring is attached to opposite wings.

At the bottom, there's a label box, describing the meaning of each arrow overlaying both diagrams: cyan arrows represent both the thrust for the ship and rotation for the rings, while blue arrows indicate the gravitational force from the centrifugal motion. A third overlay, painted in magenta, shows the locations for hatches and corridors connecting the inside of each centrifuge to the cockpit and the rest of the ship.

There's also a jab at Star Trek: "Because USS Enterprise is so out of touch with real physics", nodding at how Spock and his crew were "simply" able to stand inside the ship as if gravity was something taken for granted outside a planet.

@artshare@lemmy.world

 

Time-lapse: pareidolia as a tool for face drawing

Warning: the video contains some flashing lights. Do not watch if you have epilepsy.

This one is less about the art and more about the technique. This time-lapse is a demo of how I draw seemingly-convincing anatomy from scratch with no visual aid other than my own "instinctive" sense of pareidolia (i.e. whatever's going on in my own fusiform gyrus), so it may serve as a guide for those who draw faces.

There are a lot of techniques for drawing anatomically-convincing faces. One involves plotting some geometrical shapes using compass and straightedge in order to have a visual reference for facial proportions.

But, then, the human brain has this funny ability to see faces where ain't none. And the "uncanny valley" allows us to feel whenever a seemingly-human face isn't that human.

This mechanism usually goes this way: we see a visual pattern that triggers our "it's a face" perception, then the more specialized facial recognition mechanism kicks in, only for it to perceive how this "face" have some unexpected details (e.g. glowing irises, sharper canine teeth, etc) and/or proportions (almond-shaped eyes larger than expected), so it gets uncanny.

One can leverage it by going the reverse way: crafting an external visual pattern until it maximizes this perception, fine-tuning it for either uncanniness and/or accurateness, depending on the intended goal.

This explains the main flow going on in my mind as I'm drawing a face fully from scratch (i.e. no rotoscoping). I often start by drawing a pair of circles (meant as either eyeballs or eye sockets) to trigger my initial notion of size, then (inspired by owls) I draw the eyebrow ridge going from the silhouette for the nose slightly below the median point, then the forehead, then the mouth cavity, then the cheeks (meant to have some blushing), and the zygomatic relief, and chin, and then... well, it'll depend on the how the drawing is triggering my fusiform girus. You can see me getting back quite often to previously-drawn details as I fix these to better adjust my current perception, sometimes redoing things from scratch. I try to draw the hair as soon as I can, because it's one of the main references for this specific face.

The final shading ended up a bit "flatter" than I originally wanted to draw. I have a previously-drawn "mugshot art" where the shading ended up imbued with better 3d depth, but I didn't record a time-lapse for it, so I made another drawing.

That's pretty much everything for this post, feel free to ask if you got any questions...

Alt-text: a time-lapse disclosing the drawing of a feminine face (meant to depict Lilith, with large almond-shaped eyes, long red hair, expressive eyelashes, soft-yet-sharp chin, blushed cheeks and tender red lips with sharp fangs), seen in close mugshot. The drawing starts from a gray shape akin to a Venetian mask, then it gradually evolves into a feminine portrait.

@artshare@lemmy.world

 

Time-lapse: the surreal encounter between two owls

Warning: the video contains some flashing lights. Do not watch if you have epilepsy.

In the New World West,
with its prairies full with mounds,
She governs the gates to the undergrounds
where She laid Her nest:
as the Sun raises cluelessly,
She raises majestically.

In the Ancient Near East,
where the Sun already fled and hid,
She who rules over the Levantine arid,
where even the pharaohs become Her feast:
nothing escapes Her grips
as She raises to Her highest trips.

A meeting of the two is unlikely to be seen:
not just because of the ocean in-between,
but also the desert and the greens:
two thrones for two Owl-Queens.

Took me 3 and a half hours for me to draw this artistic attempt at putting two overly-specific (and largely disparate) owls species (with which I've been hyper-fixated lately) together within the same, surreal scene: Athene cunicularia (burrowing-owl) and Bubo ascalaphus (Pharaoh eagle-owl).

I guess it's so far the most complex art whose time-lapse I managed to record (luckily, my phone didn't crash during the drawing).

Alt-text for the final art (to be posted as a reply):

Artistic depiction of two owls unusually sitting at different simultaneous biomes while facing each other.

The leftmost A. cunicularia stands next to the entrance of a burrow. She is seen in profile, turned rightwards as she looks at the Pharaoh eagle-owl with a scheming and defiant expression.

The rightmost B. ascalaphus is perched on a boulder roughly at the same distance from the viewer (so the disparate sizes is evident). She's also seen in profile, but turned leftwards, as she looks at the burrowing-owl with a purposefully ambiguous expression (open mouth as if screeching, body slightly leaned forwards with ruffled plumage, visibly hard grip onto the surface of the boulder, wide but half-closed eyes, traits that can be either a defense-attack, dominance pose; or simply the clumsy attempt from an innately strong owl to greet a smaller owl).

The leftmost biome is dominated by grass and other vegetation alongside the burrow, all covered in shadows by dense trees at the horizon. The rightmost is an open, plain desert, with some scattered pebbles and rocks, alongside the boulder where the Pharaoh eagle-owl is perched. The biomes meet almost seamlessly, with a somewhat gradual transition between grass and sand.

The dusk sky is dominated by a large, red crescent Moon, while the Sun is barely visible setting below the horizon.

Alt-text for the time-lapse:

A time-lapse disclosing the drawing processes behind the aforementioned art: from a black canvas to the initial landscape, with the multiplication of the layers containing the pebbles, then the Moon, then the approximated rotoscoping of two real photos of both owls, then a few final touches for texture and shading.

@artshare@lemmy.world

 

Bubo ascalaphus and the wanderer man

"The Pharaohess, the Great Queen... She guides me through this endless desert, She knows every corner of it. She's the only presence in this entire desert and I owe Her my submission and devotion. Uhoo? Uhoo!"

---

Alt-text: a digital drawing depicting a bearded man, seen in profile, walking across an endless desert, while an owl (meant to be a Bubo ascalaphus, Pharaoh eagle-owl, a large-sized owl native to deserts, with deep orange eyes, prominent ear tufts and strong physiognomy) is perched on his neck. The man, wearing marine purple trousers and marine blue shirt, walks barefooted over the sand with some difficulty, seemingly weary, while he looks downward at his hands, which are extended next to his waistline with the palms facing up as if he were carrying something on his hands (but there's nothing being held). The owl, in contrast, is chillingly calm and simultaneously focused, asserting dominance over the man as she looks at his face with the same focused (and majestic) look that of when owls are watching a prey. Her head is slightly tilted leftwards (in relation to them; to us viewers, it's towards us), adding to an uncanny tenderness. Behind them, a deep red sky typical of late dusk blends with the sand at the horizon, while an enormous red crescent moon emits a deep red glow, a glow of which is the source of light for the entire scene (shadows are cast on the ground).

---

Originally, my drawing involved a bit of blood (where the owl's claws meet the man's neck because, in fact, it's something quite expected if an eagle-owl were to perch onto someone's neck with all her mighty, as her claws seem very sharp, more so than other owl genera) and the man only wore trousers (no nudity because there's not even a detailed chest, but the lack of a shirt may be seen/understood as so), so I made a more family-friendly version (no blood and he's wearing a proper shirt) in order to make it fully NSFW-free. The original version can be seen in my PixelFed gallery.

Also, I wanted to have a time-lapse of my drawing, just like I recorded for the previous drawing (Athene cunicularia, burrowing owl) I posted here. However, drawings such as this one tend to be more complex (this drawing has 33 layers, some of which use composition modes such as "linear burn" and "glow", which uses a bit more GPU; in comparison, my Athene cunicularia drawing involved just 13 layers and no composition mode), making my phone more prone to hiccuping/hanging/crashing during my drawing sessions (and recording a time-lapse is, itself, additional GPU load alongside the load from the drawing app).

@artshare@lemmy.world

 

Time-lapse: drawing of a burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia)

I'm used to draw dark and occultism-related art, but my earlier attempts on sharing my artworks on Fediverse (which includes this community) ended up invisible/hidden, perhaps due to how I flagged these as "sensitive content" (so these ended up hidden even for myself because I don't use Lemmy as my Fediverse platform).

Now, I've drawn something more "family friendly" (albeit still heavily symbolic, at least to me): it's meant to be a burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia). Partly because it's a species with with I'm quite fascinated, partly because I can't help but notice how human artistic corpora often overlooks this specific species and genus of owls.

Any image Web search and/or artistic depictions of "owl" mostly revolves around the "ideal owl", the kind of owl many people can visually think of, which often have heart-shaped faces (a trait from Tytonidae family, aka barn-owls) and/or horn-like ears/tufts (common for owls such as those from Bubo genus aka horned/eagle-owls)... however, none of these famous "owl traits" occur on Athene genus.

Nesting behavior and size is also among the trait differences: the Athene cunicularia, specifically, nest on burrows (either dug by themselves or dug by other animals), and the genus as a whole are pretty small compared to other genera, measuring 23cm on average (some other genera of small owls are Micrathene, to which the elf owl belongs, and Glaucidium, to which the pygmy owl belongs).

Niche and over-specific knowledge, indeed, but when art is a phenomenal window to the noumenal, the signified made signifier, knowing about the signifier is important, at least IMHO.

Anyways, it's an(other) attempt of drawing this specific species from scratch. I used "PENUP" app to draw it, recording the time-lapse from within there. As I'm used to draw using Sketchbook, it may not have the same quality observed from my other drawings, because color palettes, brushes and features differ across both apps.

(Trivia: as I sometimes do across my posts, there's a hidden message above, hence why the paragraphs may sound "odd"...)

@artshare@lemmy.world

7
Today is Human's Day (s3.eu-central-2.wasabisys.com)
 

Today is Human's Day

Today is Love's Day, and Friendship's Day, because it's Happiness Day and Peace Day. Also Humans's Day. And World's Day. It's Social Connection's Day, and Earning a Living's Day, also it's Job Market's Day, and HR's Day.

Also, it's Self-care Enoughness's Day, "It'll Pass" Day, "I Feel You" Day, "You Life Matters" Day, "Keep Trying" Day and "You'll Find Someone" Day, because it's also Mental Health Professionals Day, and Mental Health Institutions Day.

Oh, let's not forget, it's also Future's Day, and Hopefulness's Day. It's Narnia's Day, Oz's Day and Wonderland's Day. Last but not the least, it's Life's Day, because it's Existence's Day, Reality Day, which some are used to simplify beneath the umbrella of Demiurge's Day.

I certainly forgot other holidays associated with this very day, because too many things belong to Fool's Day.

Happy You's Day and Me's Day, because you're a lie and we're both fool!

"Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me. Fool me cluelessly, shame on both, because we're both fools being puppeteered by the Demiurge, the master of fools."

@justpost@lemmy.world

 

Does Internet still care looking onto steganographed/enciphered data?

As far as I remember the old Web, riddles and puzzles were quite common, everywhere from old social media and bulletin boards to blogs and their webrings.

Y'all may remember things such as Cicada 3301 and that 11b x 1371 cryptic YouTube video; of course, unless you're not a millennial or zennial as I am.

How could these puzzles and riddles, useful for learning a plethora of things such as Math and ciphers and steganography, messages hiding in plain sight, are seemingly gone, nowhere to be found across the so-called modern Web of nowadays?

You're currently facing one of those puzzles, except I'm just another dust in the wind so, to which extent it's still a thing nowadays?

---

Letting aside any attempt to fit a text into a steganography (it's not easy to decipher a hidden message, but it's definitely harder to craft one; yes, both the title and the previous text conceal three hidden messages), what truly happened, what is happening? It's been a while since I stopped seeing and spotting such puzzles and riddles online.

I expected to find it the most across Fediverse and Geminispace, said to be places where humans are supposed to enjoy content with layers of depth and meaning... but, since I've been wandering around, even long-form content without hidden messages seems to be met with (seems like humans can't trust lengthy texts such as this one, believing it's AI-generated), as I observe my attempts on "being the change I crave for" being met with this... void... from the cold Web of nowadays.

Given how Web is essentially defined by human users (although Dead Internet has been a thing for some time), does this have something to do with the collective tiredness going on in the world, with humans too tired to try and focus on reading beyond the visible portion of a text they see online?

Perhaps it's just the online analogous manifestation of "Dark Forest Hypothesis" (i.e. there are humans who'd engage with said content, but they're hidden and keeping absolute silence, afraid of the possibility I'd be one of the ones they're hiding from)?

Perhaps I've been just an unemployed and pedantic guy in a world where humans are too busy with mundaneness so they can't afford the time to deal with all the effort required to read online content (textual or artistic) with all the depth it requires?

Or is it just my neurodivergence being unable to find meaningful connection with this neurotypical world?

Maybe the concept and practice of "hidden messages" are somehow associated with evil things or groups of people so humans refrain from dealing with something which would (in their minds) be potentially "dangerous" or "illegal"? (I once asked about the recent deactivation of the global live feed from mastodon.social and I got a reply explicitly conflating my interest in digitally-guided spiritual gnosis with "unsafe content", two things completely unrelated).

@asklemmy@lemmy.world

 

Existence can't help but rely on itself to be proven

Any proof of existence is, categorically, detached from any scientific rigor, questionable by its own.

Beyond any ontological evidence, how could it be sustained, except through the ontology itself, ultimately speaking?

Yeah, as far as scientific inquiry goes, all it's known somehow infers this supposed validity of existence, empiricism as certainty of existence.

Skeptical by nature, of course Science must have some kind of skepticism about existence itself; this doubt can indeed be found, expressed as hypotheses such as the zero-energy universe.

Such an idea, still a matter of disagreement, hypothesizes about how universe would actually add up to nothing: net-zero sum non-existent existence.

---

This was originally a stream-of-consciousness which I restructured as a more, purposefully cryptic and poetic text... speaking of which, you may want to tinker with the initial letters from each of the four individual clauses for each stanza of the text... (Sometimes the true message isn't what can be seen: it's the unseen)

@justpost@lemmy.world

125
You're being watched (s3.eu-central-2.wasabisys.com)
 

You're being watched

How curious is it that the birdwatcher, the one who watches, is, in fact, the one being watched themselves? For whenever you watch the abyss, the abyss watches you back: she's watching, watching the one who watches her.

Source: Bay Nature, photography by Martin Nicolaus.

Alt-text: a photography of a burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia) perched behind something out-of-focus, which is occluding her from being fully seen. Only the top of her head is visible, as well as her left eye (right side of the picture), directly gazing at the viewer with a scheming-like, half-opened side-eyed expression.

@superbowl@lemmy.world

 

The summoning requirements were updated

This is a drawing I just made in Sketchbook out of ongoing political anxieties, not sure whether it fits here, especially due to the implied subjects (ongoing politics and religious symbols). Please let me know if it doesn't fit here. Feedback is appreciated...

Alt-text (in case Lemmy doesn't pull it from Calckey instance I'm hosted at): An absurdist, surreal drawing depicting an elder man (a Merlin-like wizard), full with gray hair and beard, dressed in purple robe, amidst the woods during night. He kneels before a pentacle circle drawn on the ground, which is surrounded by five black candles. Both the pentacle and the candles are glowing and lit, with the pentacle emitting a purple glow. Hovering above the pentacle, however, is a bureaucratic, quite legalese text glowing purple: "Age verification required! You must be 18 years old or older to do summonings. Follow the instructions to upload your biometrics and a valid government-issued ID. By proceeding, you agree with the terms and the collection of any required personal data. We and our 72 partners will validate your request in up to 72 hours. Charges may apply." The wizard gazes at the hovering text with an unamused expression.

@justpost@lemmy.world

150
Smile for the selfie (s3.eu-central-2.wasabisys.com)
 

Smile for the selfie

"Why so serious?"

Source: "The Burrowing Owl’s Cozy Underground Home", website "The Kids Should See This", originally from photographer Mac Stone (couldn't confirm this specific authorship because the website links to some YouTube-hosted video and I don't use YouTube anymore; I found the photo through the mentioned website)

Alt-text: Two Athene cunicularia (burrowing owl) amidst a seemingly endless leveled grassland during daylight. One of them is very close to the camera, as if she were taking a selfie, staring directly at the camera with a serious and quite menacing expression. Behind her, not too far, the second owl is gazing at the sky.

@superbowl@lemmy.world

 

Sobre a Lei 15.211

Amanhã entra em vigor a tal da lei que, "vedada a autodeclaração", exige verificações de idade até mesmo ao nível de sistema operacional. É tão amplo e incerto que até mesmo distros como MidnightBSD bloqueou IPs brasileiros, e a tendência é que outros sigam o mesmo caminho.

Confesso que estou perdendo o infinitesimal resquício de sanidade mental que ainda tenho, pois essa lei me afeta pessoalmente.

Isso porque, há cerca de 2 anos, me converti ao ocultismo, num país de maioria cristã onde intolerância religiosa é estrutural.

Fora da Internet, tento evitar falar sobre minha crença atual já que, nas várias vezes que o fiz, levei desde sermão de comerciante ("quem faz pacto com o Lúcifer cai em perdição") até a diagnóstico de esquizotipico ("pensamento mágico") da psiquiatra. Outro dia desses deu de tentar explicar minha visão sobre Lilith pro meu vizinho, apenas para eu ouvir "quando tiver lá no céu vou te ligar e perguntar como tá as coisas no inferno", isso embalado em tom de "piada" só porque ele tem relação simbiótica comigo envolvendo a chácara dele, não fosse isso o julgamento não viria em tom de piada, mas sim em tom de agressão mesmo.

Pessoas são agredidas por motivo de crença. E a Justiça, que deveria garantir (Art. 208 do CP) liberdade religiosa prevista na Constituição, apreende estátua de Baphomet do templo de Quimbanda Luciferiana, e julga que foi a Mãe de Santo quem teria sido intolerante com o motorista de Uber que recusou corrida com motivo "sangue de Jesus tem poder". Se essas vítimas, que têm toda uma egrégora registrada como instituição religiosa (templos e terreiros), sofrem ataques estruturais até mesmo da própria Justiça, imagine eu, que não pertenço a nenhuma egrégora específica porque sigo crença própria sincrética. Não tenho templos de Quimbanda ou terreiros de Candomblé pra me auxiliar legalmente no direito da prática religiosa.

Então limito-me à expressão online... exceto que meu conteúdo é geralmente NSFW, dado que muito da imageria envolvendo Lilith aborda temas tabu.

Diante de uma lei dessa, onde preciso provar ser adulto, "vedada a autodeclaração", pra ler e postar, meu CPF ficaria atrelado à minha atividade ocultista online. Não precisa ser nenhum especialista em T.I. pra saber que softwares têm falhas. Exemplo é o Discord que, meras semanas após botar validação de idade, teve tudo isso vazado.

Sim, o Brasil tem a LGPD, mas LGPD não me protege de consequências após o vazamento das minhas postagens ocultistas que passaria a estar vinculado ao meu CPF. Se nem Art. 208 me protege da intolerância estrutural, quiçá LGPD cujo escopo sequer trata isso.

Já estou desempregado por vários fatores, e ter RH conseguindo saber que sou ocultista seria, definitivamente, minha morte social (se já não estou morto socialmente, mas daí já são outros quinhentos).

Há vários outros pontos mas não cabe nesse fio.

Dito tudo isso, alguém tá sabendo como vai ser, na prática, essa lei?

@batepapo@lemmy.eco.br

view more: next ›